Dollar-Cost Averaging: The Myth that Won’t Die
Burton G. Malkiel, the author of “A Random Walk Down Wall Street.” has an op-ed in today’s WSJ defending buy-and-hold investing.
While I also advocate buy-and-hold, my take is very different from Malkeil in that I favor holding a microscopic part of the market. He favors holding the whole thing. I change one-fourth of my Buy List each year which means that the average holding period is four years.
In the op-ed, this passage caught my eye:
While no one can time the market, two timeless techniques can help. “Dollar-cost averaging,” putting the same amount of money into the market at regular intervals, implies investing some money when stocks are high, but also ensures some buying at market bottoms. More shares are bought when prices are low, thus lowering average costs.
There are two notions about dollar-cost averaging (DCA). One is that most investors make regular additions to their portfolios. People are paid in fixed amounts, so they invest that way. I don’t have a problem with that.
However, there is another notion that DCA is somehow inherently a less-risky way to invest. I’m not sure which notion Malkiel is referring to, but I want to be absolutely clear that the second notion is complete and total nonsense.
There is absolutely no inherent advantage in dollar-cost averaging over lump-sum investing. ZERO. Spreading out your investments over an extended period doesn’t decrease your risk one bit. The idea has been thoroughly refuted, yet the myth won’t die.
The advantage of dollar-cost averaging was blown to smithereens over 30 years ago in this article by George Constantinides. Here’s another article on the subject by John R. Knight and (my former finance professor) Lewis Mandell.
Lump-sum investing is the best. Don’t diversify by time, diversify by assets.
Posted by Eddy on November 18th, 2010 at 3:20 pm
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
-
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
-
Named by