Archive for March, 2009

• Lehman Stress Balls, Paperweights, Bags Coughed Up by Barclays
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 22nd, 2009 at 10:07 am

  Not sure what to make of this:

  Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. has negotiated the return of thousands of Lehman-logoed knickknacks that were mistakenly transferred to Barclays Plc through the sale of the bankrupt securities firm’s brokerage unit.
  Tote bags, umbrellas, stress balls, Tiffany paperweights and other items now stored in closets and warehouses from New York to Chicago will be returned to Lehman and sold to pay creditors, according to a court filing on March 19. Lehman filed the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history in September and has about $200 billion in unsecured liabilities left to pay, Chief Executive Officer Bryan Marsal said Jan. 28.

• Weekend Poll
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 20th, 2009 at 5:09 pm

• Gold Against Stocks
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 20th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

  Gold has had a pretty good run over the past few years. But over the past few decades, gold has badly trailed stocks. Here’s a look at gold divided by the Wilshire 5000 Total Return Index.
  

• Prices Are Still Down
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 20th, 2009 at 1:49 pm

  I thought this was in interesting chart.
  
  Prices are still down, though energy prices have made a large impact.

• AIG Outrage
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 20th, 2009 at 9:59 am

  Michael Lewis on AIG hysteria:

  Every recriminatory bone in the political body is aroused; the one thing you can do right now in Washington without getting an argument is to rail against the ethics of AIG’s bonus payment.
  Apart from Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times, it occurs to no one to say that a) the vast majority of the employees at AIG had as little as you or I to do with its quasi- criminal risk taking and catastrophic losses; b) that the most- valuable of those employees can easily find work at AIG’s competitors; and c) that if the government insists on punishing those valuable employees they will understandably leave, and leave behind a company even less viable than it is, and less likely to give the taxpayer back his money.
  And also — oh, yes — that if the government can arbitrarily break contracts made by firms in which it has taken a stake no one in his right mind will ever again make a contract with one of those firms. And so all of the banks in which the government has investment will be damaged.

  Daniel Gross wonders why more people aren’t angry with Goldman Sachs:

  People sometimes refer to the firm as Government Sachs because so many of its former employees wind up in high positions in Washington (Robert Rubin, Henry Paulson, etc.). But the sobriquet sticks today because the company is heavily reliant on the government for support. Tally up the various forms of direct and indirect taxpayer assistance Goldman has received in the last several months, and it turns out that you and I are providing billions of dollars to bail out the proud firm. The former undisputed heavyweight champion of the financial services sector has become one of New York’s biggest welfare queens.

• NCAA Tournament First Two Rounds
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 18th, 2009 at 11:26 pm

  Here’s a look at how seeds have performed during the first two rounds of the NCAA Basketball Tournament.
  Seed…….Round One……Round Two
  #1……………96-0……………84-12
  #2……………92-4……………60-32
  #3……………81-15………….48-33
  #4……………76-20………….41-35
  #5……………65-31………….35-30
  #6……………66-30………….35-31
  #7……………60-36………….18-42
  #8……………44-52……………9-35
  #9……………52-44……………3-49
  #10………….36-60………….18-18
  #11………….30-66………….11-19
  #12………….31-65………….16-15
  #13………….20-76……………4-16
  #14………….15-81……………2-13
  #15……………4-92…………….0-4
  #16……………0-96
  Here are a few thoughts.
  I’m guessing the distribution of teams is a high peek with a long downward slope. In other words, the difference between a #1 and a #3 is probably about the same as between a #5 and a #12. Since many brackets use points by seed—geometric scoring for a non-geometric—this makes some lower seeds much better bets.
  I hate to admit this but for a very high likelihood, it’s really a 12 team tournament. I know we all like the Cinderella aspect of the tournament, but the odds are very much against the underdogs.
  In the 24 years since the field was expanded, 21 of the finals winners and 20 of the losers were ranked #1, #2 or #3. I’m not advocating a change. I’m just pointing out that the dividing line seems to begin at #3.
  You’ll also notice that some seeds are pretty choice locations. For example, #12 has a decent record against #5—even better than #11 against #5, and close to #10 against #7. Whenever a #12 wins, it’s often reported as a big upset, but it’s really not. On average, more than one #12 wins each year.
  After that, #12 plays the winner of #4 versus #13. They actually have a winning record in the second round. A total of 16 #12 seeds have made it to the Sweet Sixteen.
  Compare that with #8 or #9 who have always had to play #1 in the second round. The lesson is that the longer you avoid a top three team, the better. Of course in the tournament, you’ll eventually meet one.
  Finally, #1 seeds have a very good chance to make it a perfect 100-0 this year.

• Citigroup Back Over $3
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 18th, 2009 at 11:11 pm

  Shares of Citigroup (C) closed at $3.08 today. Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying the company is in good health, or that a rally from $1 to $3 is impressive when it follows a fall from $50 to $1.
  Still, it’s up. Might things not be as bad as it looked? Is anyone out there dipping their toes in?

• 1,000-Point Rally
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 18th, 2009 at 8:53 pm

  My apologies Mr. President. You’re a better market-timer than I thought:
  

• Guess Who’s on Twitter?
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 18th, 2009 at 1:59 pm

  Bernie Madoff! Well, not really but it is funny.
  
  (Via: Barry.)

• FOMC Announcement
  Eddy Elfenbein, March 18th, 2009 at 1:58 pm

  What do you do at the top of a Treasury bubble? Buy!

  Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in January indicates that the economy continues to contract. Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth, and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending. Weaker sales prospects and difficulties in obtaining credit have led businesses to cut back on inventories and fixed investment. U.S. exports have slumped as a number of major trading partners have also fallen into recession. Although the near-term economic outlook is weak, the Committee anticipates that policy actions to stabilize financial markets and institutions, together with fiscal and monetary stimulus, will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth.
  In light of increasing economic slack here and abroad, the Committee expects that inflation will remain subdued. Moreover, the Committee sees some risk that inflation could persist for a time below rates that best foster economic growth and price stability in the longer term.
  In these circumstances, the Federal Reserve will employ all available tools to promote economic recovery and to preserve price stability. The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent and anticipates that economic conditions are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period. To provide greater support to mortgage lending and housing markets, the Committee decided today to increase the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet further by purchasing up to an additional $750 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities, bringing its total purchases of these securities to up to $1.25 trillion this year, and to increase its purchases of agency debt this year by up to $100 billion to a total of up to $200 billion. Moreover, to help improve conditions in private credit markets, the Committee decided to purchase up to $300 billion of longer-term Treasury securities over the next six months. The Federal Reserve has launched the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility to facilitate the extension of credit to households and small businesses and anticipates that the range of eligible collateral for this facility is likely to be expanded to include other financial assets. The Committee will continue to carefully monitor the size and composition of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet in light of evolving financial and economic developments.
  Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Elizabeth A. Duke; Charles L. Evans; Donald L. Kohn; Jeffrey M. Lacker; Dennis P. Lockhart; Daniel K. Tarullo; Kevin M. Warsh; and Janet L. Yellen.