Author Archive

• The Fed’s Minutes
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 16th, 2022 at 2:18 pm

  The Federal Reserve just released the minutes from its late January meeting. The market seems to be taking it as a dovish indicator. The futures market has backed some on its belief that the Fed will hike by 0.5% in March.

  Here’s the Fed’s economic outlook:

  In their discussion of current economic conditions, participants noted that indicators of economic activity and employment had continued to strengthen. The sectors most adversely affected by the pandemic had improved in recent months but continued to be affected by the recent sharp rise in COVID-19 cases. Job gains had been solid in recent months, and the unemployment rate had declined substantially. Supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic and the reopening of the economy had continued to contribute to elevated levels of inflation. Overall financial conditions had remained accommodative, in part reflecting policy measures to support the economy and the flow of credit to U.S. households and businesses. Participants judged that the path of the economy continued to depend on the course of the virus. Progress on vaccinations and an easing of supply constraints were expected to support continued gains in economic activity and employment as well as a reduction in inflation. Risks to the economic outlook remained, including from new variants of the virus.

  With regard to the economic outlook, participants agreed that the Omicron wave of the pandemic would weigh on economic activity in the first quarter of 2022. Indeed, sectors of the economy that are particularly sensitive to pandemic-related disruptions, including travel, leisure, and restaurants, were experiencing sharp reductions in activity as a result of the Omicron wave. Participants commented that, for many afflicted individuals and families, the virus continued to cause great hardship. Participants concurred that if the Omicron wave dissipated quickly, then economic activity would likely strengthen rapidly and economic growth for 2022 as a whole would be robust. Participants cited strong household balance sheets, rising wages, and effective adaptation to the pandemic by the business sector as factors supporting the outlook for strong growth this year. However, a number of participants noted that there was a risk that additional variants could weigh on economic activity this year.

  Participants noted that supply chain bottlenecks and labor shortages had continued to limit businesses’ ability to meet strong demand, with these challenges exacerbated by the emergence and spread of the Omicron variant. In particular, the Omicron wave had led to much more widespread worker absences due to illness, virus exposure, or caregiving needs, which had curtailed activity in many sectors including airlines, trucking, and warehousing. Some participants reported that their business contacts were hopeful that the effects of the Omicron wave would be relatively short lived. Nevertheless, several participants reported that their contacts expected the ongoing labor shortages and other supply constraints to persist well after the acute effects of the Omicron wave had waned. Participants’ contacts also reported continued widespread input cost pressures, which, amid generally robust demand, they reported having largely been able to pass on to their customers. A few participants commented that agricultural businesses were experiencing higher input costs, and those higher costs were putting strain on the finances of those firms even as they experienced generally strong demand for their products.

  In their discussion of the household sector, many participants noted that the onset of the Omicron wave had damped consumer demand, particularly for services, with much of the recent weakness concentrated in high-contact sectors such as travel, dining, and leisure and hospitality. Almost all of those participants anticipated that household demand would recover briskly if the Omicron wave subsided quickly, with spending supported by strong household balance sheets that were bolstered by high rates of saving earlier in the pandemic and ongoing robust gains in labor income.

  Participants noted that the labor market had made remarkable progress in recovering from the recession associated with the pandemic and, by most measures, was now very strong. Increases in employment had been solid in recent months; the unemployment rate had declined sharply, reaching 3.9 percent in December; job openings and quits were near record high levels; and nominal wages were rising at the fastest pace in decades. Several participants commented that the gains, on balance, over recent months had been broad based, with notable improvements for lower-wage workers as well as African Americans and Hispanics. Against this backdrop of a generally strong and improving labor market, many participants observed that the effects of the Omicron variant likely would only temporarily suppress the rate of labor market gains. The labor force participation rate had edged up further over the past few months, and some participants indicated that they expected it to continue to increase as the pandemic eased. A couple of participants noted that the participation rate remained lower than trend levels that account for changing demographics.

  Participants noted that their District contacts were reporting that labor demand remained historically strong and that labor supply remained constrained, resulting in a broad shortage of workers across many parts of the economy. As a result, there was widespread evidence that the labor market was very tight, including near-record rates of quits and job vacancies as well as nominal wage growth that was the highest recorded in decades. Several participants reported that District business contacts were either planning to implement or had implemented larger wage increases than those of recent years to retain current employees or attract new workers. A few participants also reported contacts having been forced to reduce operating hours or close businesses temporarily because of labor shortages.

  Acknowledging that the maximum level of employment consistent with price stability evolves over time, participants expressed a range of views regarding their assessments of current labor market conditions relative to the Committee’s goal of maximum employment. Many participants commented that they viewed labor market conditions as already at or very close to those consistent with maximum employment, citing indications of strong labor markets including the low levels of unemployment rates, elevated wage pressures, near-record levels of job openings and quits, and a broad shortage of workers across many parts of the economy. A couple of participants commented that, in their view, the economy likely had not yet reached maximum employment, noting that, even for prime-age workers, labor force participation rates were still lower than those that prevailed before the pandemic or that a reallocation of labor across sectors could lead to higher levels of employment over time.

  Participants remarked that recent inflation readings had continued to significantly exceed the Committee’s longer-run goal and elevated inflation was persisting longer than they had anticipated, reflecting supply and demand imbalances related to the pandemic and the reopening of the economy. However, some participants commented that elevated inflation had broadened beyond sectors most directly affected by those factors, bolstered in part by strong consumer demand. In addition, various participants cited other developments that had the potential to place additional upward pressure on inflation, including real wage growth in excess of productivity growth and increases in prices for housing services. Participants acknowledged that elevated inflation was a burden on U.S. households, particularly those who were least able to pay higher prices for essential goods and services. Some participants reported that their business contacts remained concerned about persistently high inflation and that they were adjusting their business practices to cope with higher input costs—for instance, by raising output prices or utilizing contracts that were contingent on their costs. Participants generally expected inflation to moderate over the course of the year as supply and demand imbalances ease and monetary policy accommodation is removed. Some participants remarked that longer-term measures of inflation expectations appeared to remain well anchored, which would support a return of inflation over time to levels consistent with the Committee’s goals.

  In their discussion of risks to the outlook, participants agreed that uncertainty regarding the path of inflation was elevated and that risks to inflation were weighted to the upside. Participants cited several such risks, including the zero-tolerance COVID-19 policy in China that had the potential to further disrupt supply chains, the possibility of geopolitical turmoil that could cause increases in global energy prices or exacerbate global supply shortages, a worsening of the pandemic, persistent real wage growth in excess of productivity growth that could trigger inflationary wage–price dynamics, or the possibility that longer-term inflation expectations could become unanchored. A few participants pointed to the possibility that structural factors that had contributed to low inflation in the previous decade, such as technological changes, demographics, and a low real interest rate environment, may reemerge when the effects of the pandemic abate. Uncertainty about real activity was also seen as elevated. Various participants noted downside risks to the outlook, including a possible worsening of the pandemic, the potential for escalating geopolitical tensions, or a substantial tightening in financial conditions.

  Participants who commented on issues related to financial stability cited a number of factors that could represent potential vulnerabilities to the financial system. A few participants noted that asset valuations were elevated across a range of markets and raised the concern that a major realignment of asset prices could contribute to a future downturn. A couple of these participants judged that prolonged accommodative financial conditions could be contributing to financial imbalances. A couple of other participants cited reasons why elevated asset valuations might prove to be less of a threat to financial stability than in past reversals of asset prices. In particular, they noted the relatively healthy balance sheet positions of households and nonfinancial firms, the well-capitalized and liquid banking sector, and the fact that the rise in housing prices was not being fueled by a large increase in mortgage debt as suggesting that the financial system might prove resilient to shocks. Some participants saw emerging risks to financial stability associated with the rapid growth in crypto-assets and decentralized finance platforms. A few participants pointed to risks associated with highly leveraged, nonbank financial institutions or the potential vulnerability of prime money market funds to a sudden withdrawal of liquidity.

  In their consideration of the stance of monetary policy, participants agreed that it would be appropriate for the Committee to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1/4 percent in support of the Committee’s objectives of maximum employment and inflation at the rate of 2 percent over the longer run. They also anticipated that it would soon be appropriate to raise the target range. In discussing why beginning to remove policy accommodation could soon be warranted, participants noted that inflation continued to run well above 2 percent and generally judged the risks to the outlook for inflation as tilted to the upside. Participants also assessed that the labor market was strong, having made substantial, broad-based progress over the past year.

  In light of elevated inflation pressures and the strong labor market, participants continued to judge that the Committee’s net asset purchases should be concluded soon. Most participants preferred to continue to reduce the Committee’s net asset purchases according to the schedule announced in December, bringing them to an end in early March. A couple of participants stated that they favored ending the Committee’s net asset purchases sooner to send an even stronger signal that the Committee was committed to bringing down inflation.

  Participants discussed the implications of the economic outlook for the likely timing and pace for removing policy accommodation. Compared with conditions in 2015 when the Committee last began a process of removing monetary policy accommodation, participants viewed that there was a much stronger outlook for growth in economic activity, substantially higher inflation, and a notably tighter labor market. Consequently, most participants suggested that a faster pace of increases in the target range for the federal funds rate than in the post-2015 period would likely be warranted, should the economy evolve generally in line with the Committee’s expectation. Even so, participants emphasized that the appropriate path of policy would depend on economic and financial developments and their implications for the outlook and the risks around the outlook, and they will be updating their assessments of the appropriate setting for the policy stance at each meeting. Participants noted that the removal of policy accommodation in current circumstances depended on the timing and pace of both increases in the target range of the federal funds rate and the reduction in the size of the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. In this context, a number of participants commented that conditions would likely warrant beginning to reduce the size of the balance sheet sometime later this year.

  In their discussion of the outlook for monetary policy, many participants noted the influence on financial conditions of the Committee’s recent communications and viewed these communications as helpful in shifting private-sector expectations regarding the policy outlook into better alignment with the Committee’s assessment of appropriate policy. Participants continued to stress that maintaining flexibility to implement appropriate policy adjustments on the basis of risk-management considerations should be a guiding principle in conducting policy in the current highly uncertain environment. Most participants noted that, if inflation does not move down as they expect, it would be appropriate for the Committee to remove policy accommodation at a faster pace than they currently anticipate. Some participants commented on the risk that financial conditions might tighten unduly in response to a rapid removal of policy accommodation. A few participants remarked that this risk could be mitigated through clear and effective communication of the Committee’s assessments of the economic outlook, the risks around the outlook, and the appropriate path for monetary policy.

• Strong Retail Sales Report for January
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 16th, 2022 at 9:48 am

  Apparently, folks don’t care that much about inflation. At least, it’s not keeping them from the malls. This morning’s retail sales report was the strongest in 11 months. Last month, retail sales rose by 3.8%. Bear in mind, that number isn’t adjusted for inflation. Wall Street had been expecting an increase of 2.3%.

  Retail sales for December were revised higher to a decline of 1.9%. The original report showed a decline of 2.5%.

  Excluding auto sales, the retail gain was 3.3%, after falling 2.8% in the previous month.

  Online shopping contributed the most on a percentage basis, with nonstore retailers seeing a gain of 14.5%. Furniture and home furnishing sales increased 7.2%, while motor vehicle and parts dealers saw a 5.7% rise.

  Food and drinking establishments, considered a barometer for the pandemic-era economy, saw sales dip just 0.9% for the month despite the major escalation in Covid cases fueled by the omicron spread.

  The stock market is down again this morning. This could be the market’s fourth loss in the last five days. We’re told that tensions are easing in Eastern Europe, but the market still seems on edge.

• Morning News: February 16, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 16th, 2022 at 5:40 am

  How Instagram’s ‘Billionaire Gucci Master’ Sank Nigeria’s Super Cop

  Here’s How Much US Inflation Would Rise If Russia Invaded Ukraine

  World’s Highest-Ever Basic Income for Young People to Be Trialed in Wales

  How Nationalism in China Has Dethroned Nike and Adidas

  The U.S.-Mexico Avocado Dispute Is Already Causing Shortages

  What Can Replace Free Markets? Groups Pledge $41 Million to Find Out.

  Senate Republicans Stall Crucial Vote on Fed Nominees

  U.S. Fed Should Act Soon And Decisively To Raise Rates -World Bank’s Reinhart

  Fed To Raise Rates 25 Bps In March But Calls For 50 Bps Grow Louder

  Out-of-Town Home Buyers Will Pay 30% More Than Locals in Hottest U.S. Markets

  Out With the Facebookers. In With the Metamates

  Buyout Firm Madison Dearborn To Take Moneygram Private In $1.8 Billion Deal

  Intel to Buy Tower Semiconductor for $5.4 billion

  Stanford Tops Harvard as Biggest Fundraiser With $1.39 Billion

  A Crucial Clue in the $4.5 Billion Bitcoin Heist: A $500 Walmart Gift Cardext

  Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

• CWS Market Review – February 15, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 15th, 2022 at 5:57 pm

  (This is the free version of CWS Market Review. If you like what you see, then please sign up for the premium newsletter for $20 per month or $200 for the whole year. If you sign up today, you can see our two reports, “Your Handy Guide to Stock Orders” and “How Not to Get Screwed on Your Mortgage.”)

  Why You Should Avoid Market-Timing

  Although the stock market will be closed this Saturday, it will mark two years since the stock market peaked before Covid-19 changed the world. On February 19, 2020, the S&P 500 closed at 3,386.15. Then all hell broke loose. The index fell for seven days in a row, and that was only the beginning.

  In a dramatic stretch of 23 trading days, the S&P 500 lost 34%. Within a few days, the S&P 500 experienced its second-, fifth- and 13th-worst percentage days in history. If that’s not enough, the index also had its fourth-, 11th- and 19th-best days in history.

  There has been nothing like that market in decades. On March 12, the Dow lost 2,350 points. Four days later, it fell another 3,000 points. Of the six worst daily point losses in the history of the Dow, five of them came during a nine-day period. The whole world, it seemed, was losing its mind. I remember how scary it was.

  The S&P 500 eventually bottomed at 2,237.40 on March 23. Three years of gains were wiped out in a single month.

  

  Yet, almost as remarkably, the market staged a dramatic turnaround. It turns out that magical things can happen when our friends at the Fed pull out all the stops. By June 8, the S&P 500 had rallied nearly 1,000 points, or 44%, off its low. In just 11 weeks, the market had made back 86% of what it had lost. By August, the market reached a new all-time high. It took less than five months to make back everything it had lost.

  Where am I going with all of this? I can faithfully say that I didn’t see either event coming. Nor did anyone else. Yet by being fully invested, we survived the crash and the recovery. In fact, we’ve gone on to make some nice profits since then. I don’t have any profound takeaway from the events of two years ago except to say that it’s a good reminder to avoid trying to time the markets. The market can be far more temperamental than you can imagine.

  I’m reminded of the words of Bernard Baruch, “Don’t try to buy at the bottom and sell at the top. It can’t be done, except by liars.”

  The Fed Needs to Prove It Is Serious

  Speaking of things temperamental, let’s turn to the U.S. economy. In last week’s issue, I said that if Friday’s inflation report comes in hot, then Wall Street will not take it well. Well, that’s exactly what happened. The U.S. government said that inflation had reached a 40-year high. The S&P 500 fell on Friday and again yesterday.

  The real action, however, came in the futures pits. Within a few days, the odds of a 0.50% rate hike in March by the Federal Reserve went from a longshot to a very real probability. The latest prices I saw place the odds of a half-point increase at 57%. Before that happens, the Fed will need to announce that it has halted all of its bond buying. That could happen any day.

  James Bullard, the top banana at the St. Louis Fed, has suggested that the Fed needs to hike by 0.5% at its next two meetings. He said that the Fed’s credibility is at stake. I’m afraid he may be too late on that. He appears to be in the minority. The odds of four rate hikes by May are currently at 10%. There’s a good chance that the Fed will target overnight rates at 1.50% to 1.75% by this summer. Even that is still well below inflation.

  The Fed must do two things. First, it needs to convince Wall Street that it’s seriously committed to fighting inflation. So far, that’s not been the case. Second, it needs to prove to investors that it’s left the “transitory” language behind. That was a big mistake for the Fed and the data has proved them wrong.

  Today, in fact, the government said that the Producer Prices Index rose by 1% in January. This data series is important because inflation tends to appear here before it works its way down to consumers. Over the past year, the PPI is up by 9.7%. That’s close to an all-time record. To give you an idea of how much things have changed, a year ago, the 12-month PPI rate was just 1.6%.

  Before the Financial Crisis, setting interest rates for the Fed wasn’t that hard. When the economy was in rough shape, you needed to bring interest rates down to being in line with the rate of inflation. When the economy was booming, you then brought rates to about 3% above the rate of inflation. Of course, I’m oversimplifying, but not by much. That’s pretty much what the Fed did for many decades, until the crisis of 2008-09.

  Right now, inflation is running much higher than interest rates. To get back to anything resembling normal would require much higher interest rates and much lower inflation. The problem with inflation is that once you see it, it’s already too late. It needs to be fought early and hard. Another issue is unanimity within the Fed. Some members appear to be unconvinced that inflation is a major problem.

  The five-year “breakeven” rate, which is basically the market’s guess as to what the annual inflation figure will be over the next five years, is currently a tad below 3%. If you’ve been reading me for some time, you’ll know that I’m a fan of watching the spread between the two- and the 10-year Treasuries. That has had a better track record of predicting the economy than a roomful of Nobel laureates. Notice how the spread has gone negative just before each of the last four recessions (the shaded areas).

  

  The 2/10 Spread has dropped down to 40 basis points. This is very unusual and it’s the kind of thing you’d see late in a business cycle. Does this mean that the Fed is close to pushing the yield curve negative? For now, we can’t say for certain, but it is cause for concern.

  Either way, this calls for two things. One is that the Fed needs to be clear about its intentions to fight inflation. The other is for investors to adopt a defensive posture. This has already been a tough year for many growth stocks, and it could soon get worse. Speaking of high-quality defensive stocks…

  Zoetis Is a Buy up to $210 per Share

  We’ve had a very good Q4 earnings season for our Buy List, and that continued today with a nice earnings report from Zoetis (ZTS).

  If you’re not familiar with Zoetis, it’s the world’s leading animal health company. Zoetis was spun off from Pfizer a few years ago. Today, the company has more than 12,000 employees and last year had revenues of $7.8 billion. Here’s a recent interview the CEO did with Jim Cramer.

  Zoetis is also an excellent example of our style of investing. We added the company to last year’s Buy List, and it was an immediate flop. By March, we had a 12% loss in Zoetis. Still, business was doing well. As we know, stock traders can be a fickle bunch, so I wasn’t too worried about the poor share performance. This is the business we’ve chosen. ZTS then turned around and rallied strongly. By the end of the year, ZTS had made a 47% gain for us. (By the way, have I mentioned that we have a premium newsletter? You can sign up for it here.)

  Once again, business is looking good, and the stock has been lousy so far in 2022. For Q4, the company said it made $1 per share. That was four cents better than Wall Street’s consensus. Quarterly revenue rose 9% to $2 billion. For the whole year, Zoetis made $4.70 per share. That’s an increase of 25% over 2020.

  “In 2021, Zoetis delivered its strongest performance ever, thanks to our innovative, diverse and durable portfolio, and the talent and commitment of our colleagues,” said Kristin Peck, Chief Executive Officer of Zoetis. “We grew revenue 15% operationally, which is once again above the expected market growth rate in the $45 billion animal health market. We also grew our adjusted net income faster than revenue, at 19% operationally, while continuing to support investments in our latest product launches and future pipeline of innovations.”

  “Looking forward, we believe this momentum sets us up for a strong 2022. We expect to continue growing revenue faster than the market in the coming year, driven by continued strength in petcare; expansion of our diagnostics portfolio internationally; and significant growth in both livestock and companion animal product sales in emerging markets, including China and Brazil. As a result, we are guiding to full-year operational growth of 9% to 11% in revenue,” said Peck.

  For Q4, sales in its U.S. business were up 9% to $1.04 billion. Sales in the international segment were up 8% to $902 million.

  Zoetis recently received approval in the U.S. for Solensia, the first injectable mAb for the control of pain associated with osteoarthritis in cats. It’s also approved in the European Union, the U.K., Canada and Switzerland. Kristin Peck noted that spending on pets has increased and spending per visit to the vet has increased.

  

  Now let’s look at guidance. For 2022, Zoetis sees revenues ranging between $8.325 billion and $8.475 billion. The company also sees earnings ranging between $5.09 and $5.19 per share. That’s earnings growth of roughly 8% to 10%. (In last week’s premium issue, I predicted $5.05 to $5.20 per share.)

  That’s a bold forecast and it tells me that we don’t have to worry about the stock’s downturn in January and February. This week, I’m lowering our buy below price on Zoetis to $210 per share.

  That’s all for now. I’ll have more for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review.

  – Eddy

  P.S. Don’t forget to sign up for our premium newsletter.

• Morning News: February 15, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 15th, 2022 at 7:05 am

  Protesters Defy Trudeau’s Emergency Powers With Border Blockades

  For China, Hosting the Olympics Is Worth Every Billion

  Iraq’s $27 Billion TotalEnergies Deal Stuck Over Contract Wrangling

  Higher Interest Rates Not a Major Worry for CFOs of Large U.S. Companies

  Farmers Feel the Squeeze of Inflation

  4 Bed, 3 Bath, No Garage Door: The Unlikely Woes Holding Up Home Building

  The Age of Anti-Ambition

  Lockheed Deal Flop Is Just Antitrust Amuse-Bouche

  Morgan Stanley Among Block-Trading Firms Facing U.S. Probe

  Trader Known as ‘Big Shot’ Battles Mystery Nickel Stockpiler

  SpaceX’s Plans to Send Thousands More Satellites Into Orbit Worry NASA

  Musk Donated Over $5.7 Billion in Tesla Shares to Charity in November

  Top Hedge Fund Managers Made $15.8 Billion in 2021 Riding Volatile Markets

  Carl Icahn Won’t Stop Till He Gets What He Wants

  The Brothers Behind a Wedding Tent Empire Know When to Say Yes

  Discarded Grapes From White Wine Production Being Turned Into Chocolate ‘Superfood’

  Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

• Warren Buffett from 1985
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 14th, 2022 at 2:22 pm

• Oil Nears $100 per Barrel
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 14th, 2022 at 11:17 am

  Happy Valentine’s Day.

  The market is down again today after a poor day on Friday. Today is a little unusual in that it’s a down day but Low Vol is down more than High Beta. That’s not unheard of, but it against the typical script.

  The S&P 500 may go back to “test” its recent low. That often happens as traders like to see how far they can push the market in either direction. On January 24, the intra-day low was 4,222.62. Today we’ve been as low as 4,385.52.

  The Energy Sector is down especially hard today. Many of the major oil companies are down over 3% today. The price for oil is getting close to $100 per barrel. All eyes are on the latest developments in Ukraine. There appears to be some talk of a resolution. We’ll see.

  I noticed that shares of 3M (MMM) are down again today. The stock is at a new 52-week low. 3M is now going for about 14 times next year’s earnings. The dividend currently yields about 3.8%. Of course, there’s a reason the stock is going for such a generous valuation. 3M has found itself in a heap of legal trouble.

  I’m not recommending 3M but I will add two notes. The first is that value investing often boils down to buying dented merchandise. The question is, how serious are the problems? The other point is that 3M is a large and diversified company. At some point, these issues will go away.

  Several Fed folks are talking today. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard is in the hawkish camp. He said the Fed’s credibility is on the line. Personally, I think the Fed shot its credibility a while ago, but it may repair some of the damage. In the futures market, the odds of a 0.5% cut in March are at 65%.

• Morning News: February 14, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 14th, 2022 at 6:59 am

  Europe Dumping Covid Curbs Puts Its Travel Rebound Ahead of Asia

  Himalaya Yogi Ran India’s Top Bourse As Puppet Master, Regulator Says

  India takes Aim at China’s Trade Coercion Against Australia

  Rapid Plunge in Developer’s Bonds Shows Transparency Risk in Chinese Property

  Why Russian Invasion Peril Is Driving Oil Prices Near $100

  Morgan Stanley’s Wilson Sees War a `Polar Vortex’ Risk to Stocks

  The Obnoxious Conceit Underlying 5G Nationalism

  Meta and Salesforce Present Differing Takes on the Metaverse

  No Sign of Light at End of Tunnel for Credit Suisse Investors

  Lockheed Martin Scraps Aerojet Rocketdyne Deal

  Olympian Eileen Gu’s Marketing Power: The Risks and Rewards for Brands

  How Did Squarespace Know Podcasts Would Get This Big?

  HSBC to Double Some Junior Banker Bonuses in Race for Talent

  Making ‘Dinobabies’ Extinct: IBM’s Push for a Younger Work Force

  Divorcing Couples Fight Over the Kids, the House and Now the Crypto

  Inside the Bitcoin Laundering Case That Confounded the Internet

  Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

• Morning News: February 11, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 11th, 2022 at 6:45 am

  How Crypto Wealth is Gentrifying Puerto Rico

  The Billion-Dollar Nickel-Swap Scandal That Shocked Singapore

  Why Some Chinese Are ‘Lying Flat’ and What That Means

  How Trucker Protests Shut the Canadian Border and Rocked the Economy

  Canadian Mayor Makes Plea for Injunction as Trucker Protest Limits Ford, GM Auto Production

  Fed Doesn’t Yet Favor a Half-Point Hike or an Emergency Move

  After Dire Decade, Emerging Markets Face Fed Liftoff Again

  U.S. Inflation Rate Accelerates to 7.5%, a 40-Year High

  U.S. Inflation Data Is Like a ‘Punch In the Stomach’ for the Fed, Says Citi Economist

  Hot Inflation Fuels Case for ‘Big-Bang’ Fed Rate Hike in March

  SoftBank’s Woes Are Mounting

  Affirm Stock Plunges 21% After a Slip of the Tweet

  MoviePass Is Relaunching — and It Wants to Track Your Eyeballs

  Zillow Shares Surge on Faster Home-Flipping Wind-Down, ‘Super App’ Plans

  Zendesk Receives Takeover Approaches

  Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

• Morning News: February 10, 2022
  Eddy Elfenbein, February 10th, 2022 at 6:22 am

  Russia Thrived as It Integrated With the West—a New Cold War Is Unraveling That

  China’s Anti-Graft Show Is Educational, With Unintended Lessons

  FDA Raises Concerns About China-Developed Drugs

  The Boston Fed Names Susan M. Collins as Its New President

  Treasury Wants to Stir Up U.S. Alcohol Market to Help Smaller Players

  Stock-Trading Ban for Congress Hits Pushback From Right and Left

  After Retail Investors’ Rebellion, the S.E.C. Wants A Stock Market Makeover

  The Real Reason America Doesn’t Have Enough Truck Drivers

  Rivian Loses Its Shine as Investors Fret About Production Delays

  Credit Suisse Posts $2.2 Billion Loss After Investment Bank Hit

  ArcelorMittal Posts Best Year Since 2008 on Historic Steel Boom

  Disney Earnings Surge Gives Boost to a CEO Finally on His Own

  WarnerMedia-Discovery Merger OK’d, But Amazon-MGM Remains in Limbo

  Solar Storm Destroys 40 New SpaceX Satellites in Orbit

  The Man Who Transformed Flying Finally Gets His Spirit-Frontier Deal

  Be sure to follow me on Twitter.