• 81% of Earnings Reports Are Beating Expectations
    Posted by on October 28th, 2010 at 9:04 am

    The market seems poised to rise today after staging a nice afternoon rally yesterday. For a while there it looked like it was going to be an ugly day. Around 1:15 pm, the S&P 500 was at 1,172, but we added more than 10 points from there. In the end, the S&P 500 only lost 0.27% yesterday.

    The good news today is that the unemployment claims report came in below expectations. Normally this is among the least-important economic reports, but I think traders want to latch on to something positive. The number of jobless claims fell by 21,000 to 434,000, which is the lowest total since July. The total number of people receiving unemployment insurance dropped to a two-year low.

    The big news today will be earnings from Nicholas Financial (NICK). After that, the big event will be tomorrow’s GDP report. I’m not sure what to expect, probably something between 1.5% and 2.2%. Anything below 3% isn’t good enough. The fourth quarter, however, may be better.

    Then next Tuesday we have the election and after that, the Fed will meet and announce QE2. I think the Fed will say that it plans to buy somewhere between $300 billion and $500 billion worth of Treasuries between, say, five years and twenty years. What the Fed will say is still up in the air, but I guarantee you that whatever they say, it won’t be enough for some people.

    The Fed is reportedly asking bond dealers, “Suppose we said we’re going to buy tons of Treasuries—and we’re not saying we are—but say we said we might say we are, how might that affect yields, if that event did in fact occur?” I’m paraphrasing, but that’s the idea.

    Here’s something interesting I spotted at MarketWatch:

    In all, with roughly half of the S&P 500 reporting by Wednesday, 81% had exceeded expectations, with just 13% coming up short, according to data compiled by Thomson Reuters.

    If that percentage holds, it would be the highest level of companies beating estimates in a quarter ever — or a least since Thomson Reuters began tracking them 16 years ago. It would top even the 79% mark hit in the third quarter of 2009, when the economy came off the absolute rock bottom of late 2008.

  • Morning News: October 28, 2010
    Posted by on October 28th, 2010 at 7:32 am

    Easing Uncertainty Pushes Dollar Lower

    Shell Says Repercussions of U.S. Drilling Moratorium Could Last Into 2012

    Bank of Japan Holds Steady, Cuts Growth Outlook

    IPOs in Asia Grab Record Share of Funds as U.S. Offers Dry Up

    China Promises Action on Trade Surplus, Emissions

    Foreclosure Activity up Across Most US Metro Areas

    Banks `Want to Sit Down’ With States to Discuss Foreclosures

    Dow Chemical Tops Estimates, Net Declines

    Sanofi’s Viehbacher Rules Out $80-a-Share Offer for Genzyme

    Stores Push Black Friday Into October

    The Canadians are Bullish….The Canadians are Bullish

  • Stocks Up, Bonds Down
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    Here’s an interesting chart of the past few years. This shows the S&P 500 (in black), along with two long-term T-bond funds (blue and gold):

    The key is to see when the two asset classes diverge. Two years ago, investors dumped stocks for the safety of Treasuries. Slightly after the top in the bond market in late 2008, stocks started to rebound in March 2009.

    During much of this year, bonds did well while stocks started to languish. Recently, however, bonds have started to swoon while stocks have continued to climb. Generally, the bond market precedes the stock market by a few months.

  • According to Intrade, It’s a GOP Landslide
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 11:59 am

    Here’s the latest look at the implied House gains for the GOP in next week’s election according to Intrade. (For a complete explanation, see this earlier post.)

    The normal caveats apply — these are very illiquid markets. I based the mean and standard deviation on the 50+ gain and 60+ gain contracts.

    The last trade on the 60+ seat gain contract was 53.5. Pairing that with the latest trade on the 50+ seat gain (80) translates to the GOP gaining a mean of 61.2 seats with a standard deviation of 13.3 seats.

    (Note: I deleted the September 4 data point due to bad data.)

  • AFLAC Hits Two-Year High
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 11:22 am

    The good news is that AFLAC (AFL) is doing well thanks to its strong earnings report. The stock finally took out its high from last April ($56.56) and has been as high as $56.80 this morning. AFLAC hasn’t been this high in two years.

    The bad news is that not much else is doing well. The Dow is currently down 133 points and the S&P 500 is off by 12. The 30-year T-bond ticked above 4% today, which is still pretty low, but it had been below 3.5% just a few weeks ago.

    Fiserv (FISV) is down with the rest of the market, which I find a bit of a surprise, although I know better than to be surprised by one-day moves. Still, Fiserv is only back to where it was a few days ago.

  • CommScope Bought Out for Half Off
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 10:40 am

    Shares of CommScope are much higher today on the news that it’s being bought out by Carlyle Group for $3.9 billion. The price tag comes to $31.50 per share which is a 36% premium to yesterday’s close.

    CommScope is working to revive sales after the global recession hurt demand last year. Carlyle is banking on an increase in demand for fiber-optic networks as phone- and Internet-service providers update their systems to accommodate increasing amounts of video and data.

    CommScope, which sells its products worldwide, said revenue this quarter will be $730 million to $780 million, missing the $805.9 million predicted by analysts in a Bloomberg survey. The company has raised prices as its costs have increased, cutting into sales, Chief Financial Officer Jearld Leonhardt said in a separate statement. Sales a year earlier were $748.5 million.

    The buyout is the good news. The bad news is that even after a 36% premium, CommScope is still going for half its 2007 high. It’s even well below where it was in 1999 and 2000.

    Sure, many stocks are in the same boat, but I think it’s important to put a 36% premium into some context.

  • Earnings Calendar
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 9:30 am

    Here’s our updated earnings calendar for the stocks on the Buy List:

    Company Ticker Symbol Earnings Date Estimated EPS Reported EPS
    Intel INTC 12-Oct $0.50 $0.52
    Gilead GILD 19-Oct $0.87 $0.90
    Johnson & Johnson JNJ 19-Oct $1.15 $1.23
    Stryker SYK 19-Oct $0.77 $0.80
    SEI Investments SEIC 20-Oct $0.26 $0.30
    Baxter BAX 21-Oct $0.97 $1.01
    Eli Lilly LLY 21-Oct $1.15 $1.21
    Reynolds American RAI 21-Oct $1.34 $1.35
    Fiserv FISV 26-Oct $1.00 $1.04
    AFLAC AFL 26-Oct $1.39 $1.45
    Nicholas Financial NICK 28-Oct $0.30
    Moog MOG-A 4-Nov $0.70
    Wright Express WXS 4-Nov $0.68
    Becton Dickinson BDX 4-Nov $1.25
    Sysco SYY 8-Nov $0.51

    Note that this only covers the stocks on the March/June/September/December reporting cycle. Also, the $0.30 cent estimate for Nicholas Financial isn’t the Street’s view, but it’s my view.

  • Morning News: October 27, 2010
    Posted by on October 27th, 2010 at 7:58 am

    Canadian Men are Confident about Stock Market

    Oil Is Steady as Consumer Confidence Climbs, Dollar Rebounds

    Orders for U.S. Durable Goods Likely Climbed, Boosting Growth

    Stock Futures Dip as Investors Rethink Stimulus Views

    India’s Currency Attracts Investors, but Damages Exports

    Mortgage Applications in U.S. Increase, Spurred by Lower Borrowing Costs

    Comcast 3Q Profit Falls 8.2%; Adjusted Results Beat Street Views

    P&G First-Quarter Profit Falls 6.8%, Tops Analysts’ Estimates

    Sprint Posts Wider Loss Than Estimated on Handset Upgrade Costs

    Why There Are No Televisions at Fusion

  • Malcolm Gladwell on General Motors
    Posted by on October 26th, 2010 at 10:51 pm

    Here’s a sample from the latest New Yorker:

    Next up was General Motors. Team Auto’s idea was to bypass the traditional bankruptcy procedure, in which the entire company would be restructured through a protracted process of negotiation with creditors. Instead, the company would be divided into two. “Old G.M.” would contain the unwanted factories and debts and unused assets—all of which would be wound down and sold over time. The best parts of the automaker would be transferred to “New G.M.,” an entity funded and owned by the American taxpayer. The task of carving out the new entity was enormously complex, and involved rewriting countless contracts with unions, suppliers, and creditors. To minimize disruption to the company’s operations, Team Auto worked with lightning speed. Rattner would rise at five-thirty, be on the treadmill at the gym by six, and in the office by seven. Lunch was a tuna-fish sandwich at his desk. He wouldn’t be back at his rented condo in Foggy Bottom until eight or nine, catching up on the day’s e-mails before heading to bed. One of Rattner’s team members spent his first month on a friend’s couch in Virginia. Another worked around the clock during the week, and then made the five-hour drive every weekend to see his family, in Pittsburgh. None had any time for ceremony. At one point, two members of Team Auto, Brian Osias and Clay Calhoon, called for a sitdown with senior Chrysler executives at eleven on a Saturday morning. “The executives were almost all middle-aged industry veterans,” Rattner recounts. “Osias was thirty-two years old and Calhoon was twenty-six, and both looked younger than their years.” Calhoon announced to the room, “We’re going to sit at this table until we’re done.” They were there until 2 A.M. on Sunday. On another occasion, the Team Auto member Harry Wilson had a meeting with senior G.M. officials, who arrived with a hundred-and-fifty-page document. Rattner writes, “ ‘What’s this?’ Harry asked. ‘The agenda,’ came back the reply. Harry, almost laughing, said, ‘You can’t run a meeting with a 150-page agenda!’ ” He substituted his own. Rattner took the job as Auto Czar in February. He was back home in New York, mission accomplished, by July.

    Rattner has since run into some trouble. Recently, an S.E.C. investigation into a “pay to play” scandal involving the New York state pension fund led to sanctions against Rattner, who has reportedly accepted a two-year ban from the securities business. But there is no question that the auto bailout represents one of the signature accomplishments both of his career and of the Obama Administration. In August, G.M. posted its second quarterly profit in a row, its best result in three years. Chrysler, for its part, is now safely in the hands of Fiat, at least for the time being. Two years ago, when the heads of G.M., Ford, and Chrysler came to the Senate in the hope of gaining relief, no one could have imagined such a favorable outcome. At the time, the Center for Automotive Research estimated that the collapse of the Big Three would result in as many as three million lost jobs. So soon after the Wall Street rescue, there seemed little public or political appetite for another taxpayer bailout. The reaction of Richard Shelby, the ranking Republican on the Senate finance committee, was typical. “I don’t believe they’ve got good management,” he said of G.M. “They don’t innovate. They are a dinosaur. . . . I don’t believe the twenty-five billion dollars they’re talking about will make them survive. It’s just postponing the inevitable.” The reason to bring in a private-equity expert is that he would never be so defeatist. To someone like Rattner, there is nothing wrong with giving a dinosaur money if you think you can fix the dinosaur. One might even say that the private-equity investor prefers the dinosaur, because dinosaurs are cheap, which increases the potential profit at the end. And then the world will look at him with awe and say, “Wow, you turned around a dinosaur”—even if, on closer examination, that wasn’t what happened at all.

  • AFLAC Earns $1.45 Per Share
    Posted by on October 26th, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    AFLAC (AFL) just reported Q3 operating earnings today of $1.45 per share. (I have to apologize because this was a surprise. For some reason, I was expecting AFL’s earnings tomorrow.)

    For insurance companies, we always want to look at the operating number. The company said to expect $1.35 to $1.38 per share. Wall Street was expecting $1.39 per share.

    These are great results. I can’t believe this stock is going for 38 times quarterly earnings.

    The average exchange rate of the yen in the quarter was 85.74 to the dollar, stronger than 93.56 a year earlier. The yen hit 15-year highs against the dollar in the quarter.

    For the year, Aflac expects operating earnings of $5.52 to $5.57 per share, assuming the yen averages somewhere between 80 and 85 to the dollar in the fourth quarter.

    Aflac also warned that, if interest rates stay at historically low levels, operating earnings growth in 2011 would likely be at the low end of its forecast range — 8 percent to 12 percent before currency impacts.