Obamanomics
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 20th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Now that it’s very likely he could become president, what does Barack Obama want for his economic policy? I’m not sure if this is real policy or just pandering.

Mr Obama’s plan would lower the corporate tax rate for companies that met criteria including maintaining their headquarters in the US, maintaining or increasing their US workforce relative to their overseas workforce, holding a neutral position in union drives among their employees and providing decent healthcare.
The lowered rate would be paid for by the abolition of tax breaks that encourage companies to shift jobs overseas. “In the last year alone, 93 plants have closed in Ohio,” Mr Obama said. “And yet, year after year, politicians in Washington sign trade agreements that are riddled with perks for big corporations but have absolutely no protections for American workers.”
Mr Obama’s plan met instant scepticism from otherwise sympathetic Democratic economists who said it would require a large regulatory apparatus to put into practice. They also said that companies could “game the system” by spinning off overseas subsidiaries in order to reduce the offshore-onshore workforce ratio.
They questioned whether it was necessary to provide incentives for employers to provide health insurance since Mr Obama’s healthcare plan would already mandate them to do so. Finally, Mr Obama has already tied up the estimated $10bn (€6.8bn, £5.1bn) in revenues that would be saved from abolishing tax incentives for multinational companies that retain their profits overseas.
“I would say that this plan is borderline unimplementable,” said a Democratic economist in Washington. “It is also puzzling. Normally presidential candidates only come up with plans that are unrealistic when they are losing. But Obama is now the favourite.”

Defaulting Before the Resets
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 20th, 2008 at 10:23 am

One of the big fears over the housing mess is that borrowers would default once their mortgages reset. It turns out, this is happening before the reset:

Defaults for subprime loans issued in 2007 – none of which have reset yet – hit 11.2 percent in November. That represents perhaps 300,000 households, and is twice the default rate that 2006 loans had 10 months after being issued, according to Friedman, Billings Ramsey analyst Michael Youngblood.
Defaults are spiking well before resets come into play thanks to the lax lending environment of the past few years. Many borrowers were approved for mortgages that they had little chance of affording, even at the low-interest teaser rates .
“I was rather shocked by the characteristics of the 2007 loans,” said Youngblood.
Hybrid ARMs start with very affordable fixed-rate terms of two or three years. After that, rates can jump three percentage points or more, and then re-adjust even higher every six months to a year. On a $200,000 mortgage, a reset could add nearly $400 to the monthly mortgage payment.

Today’s Inflation Report
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 20th, 2008 at 9:55 am

Today’s report on consumer prices shows that inflation is a still a problem. The headline rate was 0.4% and the core rate was 0.3%. Both were 0.1% above expectations.

Over the last four years, the headline CPI Index has grown at a 3.3% rate. The Fed Funds rate is currently targeted at 3%.
To put the resurgence of inflation into some perspective, here’s a look at the four-year trailing rate of the core CPI.

The line is clearly moving in the wrong direction, but we’ve seen a lot worse.

The NASDAQ Stock Market on WallStrip
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 20th, 2008 at 9:48 am

The exchanges have been great stocks. NDAQ’s earnings-per-share last quarter doubled.

A Quick Look at the Bear Market
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 19th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

Here’s a quick look at how some indexes have fared since the beginning of 2007.

Even though the stock market is down, much of the damage has been contained to banking stocks and cyclical stocks (particularly homebuilders). Consumer stock have largely been unaffected.

Paul Krugman’s Favorite Word
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 19th, 2008 at 10:33 am

Aaron Schiff looks at Paul Krugman’s favorite word.
(Hat Tip: Felix Salmon)

Rules for Sovereign Wealth
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 19th, 2008 at 10:29 am

One of the issues in today’s market is the role of Sovereign Wealth Funds. Many of these funds are run by not-so-friendly countries and they’ve placed several sizeable investments in western firms.
The question many governments have is, how to deal with it. We don’t know exactly what these funds are or their objectives. Since this business is inherently international, the Financial Times opines in favor or global standards of conduct.
I think that’s a terrible idea. Unless there are anti-trust or national security concerns, the decision to sell any company should rest with the shareholders and the shareholders alone. If the great sultan of Petrostan wants to blow a few billion on some American bank that lost its shorts investing in subprime, that’s between the sultan and the shareholders.
I also think that owning parts of the west would be beneficial for these countries. It’s harder to kill off all the infidels when they’re the ones responsible for your quarterly dividend payments.

I’m Back!
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 19th, 2008 at 9:06 am

I’m back—tanned, rested and ready. Actually, I’m slightly burnt, but that aside, Florida was wonderful.
Here are a few items this morning. In case you missed this, the Wall Street Journal had a great story on “Joe Herrick of Gutterman Research.” That’s the nom de conference call of some hoaxer who manages to slip into real corporate conference calls. When it’s Joe’s turn to ask a question, he lays out some hyper-wonky question to senior management. Stammering and jargon ensues.
Some CEOs are on to Joe and they find him highly annoying. Joseph Weisenthal calls him his “personal hero.” I agree, it’s pretty amusing. Most conference calls are dull, and they’re more about showcasing the analysts instead of the company.
Medtronic (MDT) reported earnings this morning of 63 cents a share, two cents better than what the Street was expecting. These results exclude very large charges dealing with legal issues and acquisitions. The company earned 61 cents a share last year.
Here’s a look at Medtronic’s sales and earnings for the past few quarters:
Quarter………..EPS………….Sales
Jul-01…………$0.28………..$1,455.70
Oct-01………..$0.29………..$1,571.00
Jan-02………..$0.30………..$1,592.00
Apr-02………..$0.34………..$1,792.00
Jul-02…………$0.32………..$1,713.90
Oct-02………..$0.34………..$1,891.00
Jan-03………..$0.35………..$1,912.50
Apr-03………..$0.40………..$2,148.00
Jul-03…………$0.37………..$2,064.20
Oct-03………..$0.39………..$2,163.80
Jan-04………..$0.40………..$2,193.80
Apr-04………..$0.48………..$2,665.40
Jul-04…………$0.43………..$2,346.10
Oct-04………..$0.44………..$2,399.80
Jan-05………..$0.46………..$2,530.70
Apr-05………..$0.53………..$2,778.00
Jul-05…………$0.50………..$2,690.40
Oct-05………..$0.54………..$2,765.40
Jan-06………..$0.55………..$2,769.50
Apr-06………..$0.62………..$3,066.70
Jul-06…………$0.55………..$2,897.00
Oct-06………..$0.59………..$3,075.00
Jan-07………..$0.61………..$3,048.00
Apr-07………..$0.66………..$3,280.00
Jul-07…………$0.62………..$3.127.00
Oct-07………..$0.58………..$3,124.00
Jan-08………..$0.61………..$3,405.00
The company also said that it wouldn’t be surprised to see Wall Street’s full-year estimate rise from $2.52 a share to $2.54 a share.
On Sunday, The New York Times profiled David Swenson, the very successful manager of Yale’s endowment. His advice to investors is, “Don’t try anything fancy. Stick to a simple diversified portfolio, keep your costs down and rebalance periodically to keep your asset allocations in line with your long-term goals.”
I agree with him and that’s pretty much the philosophy of this website. Although I disagree with his view that superior performance is impossible for individual investors. I don’t believe for a second that the little guy is “shut out.”
In fact, I think the smaller investor has many advantages over professional investors. No individual investor has to struggle to “make” a quarter or beat a benchmark. Plus, individuals are probably less willing to follow the Wall Street crowd.
The rules for beating the market are the same for everyone, buy and hold good companies going for a good price.

The Carter Family: Are You Lonesome Tonight?
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 15th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

Is Obama Good for Business?
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on February 14th, 2008 at 11:09 am

We better start asking now. Business Week writes:

So what would an Obama Presidency look like for business? “It would be a pragmatic, center-left administration,” says Democratic political strategist Steve McMahon, who is unaligned with a Presidential candidate this year. “He’s been pretty clear that business would have a seat at the table, but business wouldn’t be able to buy all the chairs.”
Obama’s record in the Senate is thin, but it does hold some indicators of where he might go as President. Obama has sponsored bills backing a host of traditional Democratic causes, from union labor to alternative fuel to the earned income tax credit. In one move that was unpopular among business executives, Obama sponsored a bill to give shareholders a nonbinding proxy vote on executive pay. Obama voted for a free-trade pact with Peru that contained provisos to protect the Peruvian environment and Peruvian labor. That’s popular stuff with the American left, but hard to take if you’re a U.S. business owner who wants costs to stay low in your new Peru operation. And in a reflection of the Democratic Party’s drift away from pure free-trade positions, Obama says he would look to amend the NAFTA trade agreement to add similar protections to the Clinton-era pact.

In October, George Will profiled Austan Goolsbee, one of Obama’s top economic advisers.