• Hedge Funds Now An Official Cultural Phenomenon Fit to Print
    Posted by on December 8th, 2006 at 6:19 am

    06fonz.jpg
    So sayeth The New York Times:

    In October, John Wiley & Sons rolled out its latest how-to book, “Hedge Funds for Dummies.’’ Doug Ellin, the creator of “Entourage” on HBO, is seeking to transplant that show’s successful premise of dudes living large to the world of seeking alpha. And for those who just want to look like a hedge fund manager, Kenneth Cole offers the Hedge Fund — a leather loafer available in black or brown, recently available on its Web site at a clearance price of $119.98.
    Hedge funds have become the new cultural shorthand for fast money. In the 1980s, corporate raiders and bond traders, as represented by Gordon Gekko and Sherman McCoy, were models for those seeking to be masters of the universe. The 1990s brought the Internet entrepreneur and the day trader, two variations on the Generation X slacker who made millions without leaving his apartment, using only a computer and his savvy.

    Read the whole thing. “Wall Street Warriors” makes an appearance.

  • Calls to Shut Down Wall Street
    Posted by on December 8th, 2006 at 6:04 am

    The death of Sean Bell has inspired a call to shut down Wall Street for a day:

    The December 12th Movement, a human rights group that organised the protest, wants Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly to step down and called for a “Day of black outrage” on December 22 that would “shut Wall Street down”.

  • We’re Surrounded
    Posted by on December 7th, 2006 at 2:16 pm

    Surrounded1.jpg
    Starbucks (SBUX) has the White House completely surrounded. I’m not a conspiracy theorist, but this looks like it took some planning.
    Are they planning a coup?
    Update: Uh oh.

  • If I Had No Soul….
    Posted by on December 7th, 2006 at 11:49 am

    image362.png
    No, I couldn’t. I just couldn’t.
    Let’s pretend this post never happened.

  • The Final Days at UNH
    Posted by on December 7th, 2006 at 6:14 am

    On the front page of today’s WSJ, James Bandler and Charles Forelle look at how UnitedHealth’s board gradually turned against CEO Bill McGuire during the options back-dating scandal. This is a good story, and I think I’ve misjudged what happened at UNH.
    From reading today’s article, I don’t think McGuire believed he had done anything wrong. Of course, intent to break the law isn’t an issue for the courts, but it is an issue for me and how I value a company. I can’t say that UNH was guided by a culture of corruption. If McGuire did break the law—and it appears he did—it was probably a case of negligence and oversight. As far as the company goes, it looks fine. Business is booming.
    Obviously, any wrong-doing should be punished, but McGuire never acted as a criminal. Even as the scandal broke, he responded quickly and prudently. Enron, to use an unpleasant comparison, was a criminal enterprise, pure and simple. The company was a fraud and its business was to deceive investors. By contrast, UnitedHealth has been a spectacularly successful company, thanks in large measure to McGuire’s leadership.
    As an investor, the more important issue to me is how the board could have authorized such large options grants to their CEO. Look, I’m all for rich people being rich, but…come on. His options were worth over $1 billion. Now that he’s gone, that will no longer be a problem. Plus, it will take a long time to figure out exactly what he’ll be able to keep.
    If anything, I’m more inclined to like UNH by seeing how responsibly it behaved during this ordeal. The company now has a new CEO and a (somewhat) clean slate. For the first nine months of this year, EPS has increased by 21.8%, from $1.74 to $2.12. But the stock is almost a mirror image, down 21.1%.
    I’m going to unveil the 2007 Buy List next Friday, December 15. Expect to see UNH there.

  • Home Depot Back-Dated Options Back to 1981
    Posted by on December 6th, 2006 at 8:13 pm

    Home Depot’s (HD) internal review found unrecorded expenses of $200 million. Some of it going as far back as 1981.

    All options granted since 2002 had an exercise price based on the market price of the company’s stock on that date, Home Depot said today.
    Options granted from December 2000 through the end of 2001 had an exercise price based on the market price of the company’s stock on the date of a specific meeting or some other established criteria.
    For annual option grants and certain quarterly grants from 1981 through November 2000, the company regularly reviewed closing prices for a given period and selected a date with a lower stock price, Home Depot said.
    Backdating occurred “at all levels of the company” and involved managers who have since left, Home Depot said.

    At least they were faithful to tradition.

  • A Closer Look at Respironics
    Posted by on December 6th, 2006 at 11:55 am

    Many years ago, when I got my first job in finance, I worked for a sleazy brokerage firm in Boston. This place was truly rock bottom. I was just out of school and it was the only job I could get. This firm made the Boiler Room look like Goldman Sachs.
    All day long, I cold called people in and around Boston. I guess with the advent of cell phones, cold calling has gone away. But that’s all I had to go on. I didn’t even have my own desk. Several of us where bunched around a table loaded with phones, and we had stacks of Boston white pages. Even thinking about it is giving me chills.
    The place was more like a frat house than a place of business. I finally had enough so I applied for a job in the research department. The head of the department told me to write a report on Respironics (RESP). So I rolled up my sleeves and got to work. I collected everything on the company I could find. I read up on sleep apnea. I read all of the company’s SEC filings. I read other companies reports. I called experts. For several days, I did nothing but eat and sleep Respironics.
    When I finally wrote my report, I concluded that Resprionics’ stock was fairly valued. That was my big mistake. Well, I was right—the stock was fairly valued. But I soon learned that it was research director’s absolute favoritest stock in the whole wide world. As you can imagine, he hated my report and I didn’t get the job. So much for open-minded Wall Street research.
    Ever since then, Respironics has had a special place in my heart. After I wrote my report, the stock flatlined for several months. Just as I thought, it was fairly valued. But in the long run, the research director was right, it’s been a very good stock.
    For the past year, however, Respironics hasn’t done much. Here’s a look at the stock’s performance:
    image361.png
    The yellow line (right scale) is the company’s earnings-per-share. The two scales are aligned 25 to 1, so when the lines cross, the P/E ratio is 25.

  • The Worst CEO of the Year
    Posted by on December 6th, 2006 at 9:45 am

    Herb Greenberg offers the award of 2006’s Worst CEO to Ilia Lekach of Parlux (PARL). Parlux is the company behind Paris Hilton’s perfume. Need we say more. Patrick Byrne of Overstock.com (OSTK) came in second. Once again, need we say more.
    Congratulations to all our contestants. Better luck next year!

  • Depressing Fact of the Day
    Posted by on December 5th, 2006 at 12:24 pm

    From John Fund:

    Last year, of the 25 largest initial public offerings in the world, only one took place in America. This year, Hong Kong is likely to end up as the No. 1 market for stock offerings world-wide.

  • Happy Birthday Irrational Exuberance
    Posted by on December 5th, 2006 at 10:22 am

    It was 10 years ago today that Alan Greenspan made his famous “irrational exuberance” speech. Here’s the money paragraph:

    Clearly, sustained low inflation implies less uncertainty about the future, and lower risk premiums imply higher prices of stocks and other earning assets. We can see that in the inverse relationship exhibited by price/earnings ratios and the rate of inflation in the past. But how do we know when irrational exuberance has unduly escalated asset values, which then become subject to unexpected and prolonged contractions as they have in Japan over the past decade? And how do we factor that assessment into monetary policy? We as central bankers need not be concerned if a collapsing financial asset bubble does not threaten to impair the real economy, its production, jobs, and price stability. Indeed, the sharp stock market break of 1987 had few negative consequences for the economy. But we should not underestimate or become complacent about the complexity of the interactions of asset markets and the economy. Thus, evaluating shifts in balance sheets generally, and in asset prices particularly, must be an integral part of the development of monetary policy.

    It doesn’t seem that dramatic, but at the time, it was taken very seriously. The next day, the Dow dropped 55 points. Since then, the market has more than doubled. The S&P 500 has gone up about 90%, plus there’s another 17% from dividends. Inflation is up about 28%.