-
CWS Market Review – May 25, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 25th, 2021 at 6:29 pm“I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people.”
– Isaac Newton(This is the free version of CWS Market Review. Don’t forget to sign up for the premium newsletter for $20 per month or $200 for the whole year. Thank you for your support.)
Finance and Physics Envy
In this week’s issue, I’ll let you in on a little secret about finance. Finance suffers from a bad case of physics envy. The greats of physics have come up with all these cool equations that help explain the world. Finance wants in on the action.
As a result, Finance has come with its equations as well. The problem is that the equations are good but they’re not perfect, and that matters a lot in finance.
Finance would have you believe its practitioners are calm and rational. They simply follow the math. But sometimes numbers only tell you so much. I’ll give you an example. During the 1960s and early 1970s, there was a tremendous bull market in a select group of stocks that the press named the Nifty Fifty. Some classic Nifty 50 names were Coke, McDonalds, Disney, Polaroid, Eastman Kodak and IBM.
There was an odd connection to many of these stocks. They were seen as companies that promoted social harmony. It may seem somewhat naïve today but that was an important concern during the tumultuous 1960s. Think of the famous Coke ad of young people from different areas of the world singing the praises of Coca-Cola.
The Nifty 50 were considered “one decision” stocks. You just had to buy and hold on. The idea of social harmony gripped Wall Street. The valuations of the Nifty 50 soon left orbit. At one point, their collective P/E ratio was twice that of the rest of the stock market. The 1973-74 bear market was particularly hard on the Nifty 50. Bear in mind that the crash was the worst since 1929.
Here’s a look at Disney. Adjusted for splits, the stock went from 10 cents at its 1966 low to $2.50 by its 1973 high.
Interestingly, several of the Nifty 50 names have outperformed the market since 1972. So even paying a premium worked out after a long period. My point is that a non-numerical theme can take hold and override any concern about valuations.
This happened during the dot-com bubble when the concern was the first-mover advantage. Everyone, I recall being told, had to be aware of this. For example, the only reason Microsoft became the big winner wasn’t because they were good. No, it was that they were first and they made the industry standard.
This idea also goes by the name Winner-Take-All. (That was the name of a book in the 1990s, and the phrase turned up in Bill Clinton’s campaign speeches.)
The idea is that an early entrant could establish an industry standard which remains in place simply because it’s already there. It’s not better—it’s just there. I can’t tell you how many times I was told that some Internet stock was just like the QWERTY keyboard. There was even a magazine called The Industry Standard. In 2000, it sold more ad pages than any magazine in America. Unfortunately, the magazine folded in August 2001.
Here’s a good exercise. Imagine a roomful of people. I tell every person to choose a number between zero and 100. I say that I’ll give a cash prize to the person whose number is closest to two-thirds of the average of all the guesses.
Well, a smart person would assume the average of everyone’s guess is around 50. Therefore, two-third of that is around 33.
Easy? Not exactly. Everyone else is aware of the rules so they’ll say 33 as well. Now we’re caught up in a cycle of smaller guesses and still smaller two-thirds. Eventually, it will hit zero. (I believe studies of this game show the winning bid is around 15.)
This exercise highlights an important part of finance. Market participants know they’re part of the game. Their feelings play an important role in determining the price. In physics, gravity doesn’t know it’s being watched.
Again, numbers only tell you so much. You’ve probably heard stories like this. An art dealer has a painting she can’t move. It hangs on the wall day after day. She then triples the price, and it sells the next day. Even if it’s not literally true, it’s certainly believable.
Academics who have studied horse-racing bets have found that the absolute worst pony to bet on is the longshot. It’s obvious to me why. Because people want to bet on the longshot. (Duh!) It’s the same as the painting. Price becomes the issue. As a result, people over-bet on the longshot which unnaturally lowers its odds.
Does it make sense? Of course not. This isn’t rocket science. It’s much harder than that.
Stock Focus: Veeva Systems
I like to say that the only thing better than owning a monopoly is owning a near-monopoly. After all, the real thing tends to draw too much attention.
That leads to me to Veeva Systems (VEEV) of Pleasanton, CA. While Veeva isn’t technically a monopoly, it enjoys many of the advantages that a monopoly has. Veeva is a cloud-computing company that’s focused on pharmaceutical and life sciences industry applications. The company was founded in 2007 by Peter Gassner and Matt Wallach. Gassner has become a billionaire along the way and he currently serves as CEO.
What Veeva does is it helps drug companies capture clinal trial data and follow regulations while allowing their sales force to be more effective. The company has been very successful. In 2019, Veeva became the fifth software-as-a-services company to join the billion-dollar revenue club. The key is that Veeva brings the benefits of cloud computing to a single industry.
The age of Covid has been critical for Veeva. In order to run all those clinical trials, it normally involves visiting doctors and researchers. Veeva allows that to happen virtually. That places Veeva’s services in great demand. A particular strength is that Veeva helps its clients comply with government regulations.
I have to confess that watching Veeva has become somewhat entertaining because Wall Street consistently predicts that Veeva’s remarkable run is about to come to an end. Yet each quarterly earnings report easily dispels that notion.
Veeva has now beaten Wall Street’s consensus for at least the last 16 quarters in a row. (It could be even longer, but that’s as far back as my data goes.)
The next earnings report (their fiscal Q1) is due out this Thursday, May 27. For Q1, Veeva expects total revenues between $408 and $410 million and earnings between 77 and 78 cents per share. That’s unusually narrow guidance. For the entire year, Veeva sees revenues between $1.755 and $1.765 billion and earnings of $3.20 per share.
Veeva’s stock has not done particularly well compared with the overall market. The stock has lagged since October. Veeva has been ganged up on more than once by a nest of short-sellers. Their mantra has been, “Sure, Veeva’s had some impressive growth until now but the total addressable market isn’t that large.” I think that’s way off base.
Now let’s get to some truly remarkable stats. Veeva maintains gross margin in excess of 70%. That’s very impressive. Their operating margins are consistently over 25% and the company doesn’t carry any long-term debt. That’s a testament to how strong a position Veeva has in its market. Peter Gassner has referred to Veeva as having delivered what he calls “30/30” quarters, meaning 30% growth and 30% operating margins.
While I like Veeva a lot, I’m not a fan of the share price. Even if we assume the company’s optimistic forecast is correct (and it probably is), that means Veeva is currently trading around 80 times this year’s earnings estimate. That’s about five times what many other stocks go for.
I understand the need to pay for growth, but investors must keep things in perspective. Even if Veeva continues to cream estimates, the stock is still very, very pricey.
That’s why this earnings report is so important. If traders react badly, and they often do, it could knock the shares down. Personally, I’d love to see Veeva with a lot lower share price.
That’s all for now. I’ll have more for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review.
– Eddy
P.S. Don’t forget to sign up for our premium newsletter.
-
Heico Earns 51 Cents per Share
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 25th, 2021 at 4:27 pmHEICO (HEI) today reported net income of $141.3 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, in the first six months of fiscal 2021, as compared to $197.3 million, or $1.44 per diluted share, in the first six months of fiscal 2020. Net income in the second quarter of fiscal 2021 was $70.7 million, or 51 cents per diluted share, as compared to $75.5 million, or 55 cents per diluted share, in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
Net income, operating income and net sales in the first six months and second quarter of fiscal 2021 were adversely affected by the COVID-19 global pandemic as discussed below.
Operating income was $177.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021, as compared to $219.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2020. In the second quarter of fiscal 2021, operating income was $96.7 million, as compared to $108.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
The Company’s consolidated operating margin was 20.0% in the first six months of fiscal 2021, as compared to 22.5% in the first six months of fiscal 2020. The Company’s consolidated operating margin was 20.7% in the second quarter of fiscal 2021, as compared to 23.1% in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
Net sales were $884.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021, as compared to $974.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2020. In the second quarter of fiscal 2021, net sales were $466.7 million, as compared to $468.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2020.
EBITDA was $224.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2021, as compared to $262.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2020. In the second quarter of fiscal 2021, EBITDA was $120.0 million, as compared to $130.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2020. See our reconciliation of net income attributable to HEICO to EBITDA at the end of this press release.
-
Fastest Home Price Growth in 15 Years
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 25th, 2021 at 10:48 amThis morning’s Case-Shiller report said that home prices rose at their fastest pace in 15 years. Over the 12-month period ending in March, home prices increased by 13.2%. In the 12-month period ending in February, prices were up 12%.
Amazon sad it’s buying MGM. This is interesting news from the standpoint of business history.
Louis B. Mayer was the CEO of MGM (and the second M). He was the titan of Hollywood and the highest-paid man in America.
Oddly, MGM was a subsidiary of Loews. Marcus Loew ran a theater company. He bought Metro Pictures. Then Goldwyn pictures, and finally Mayer Pictures. Loew put Mayer in charge.
From the 1930s through the 1950s, MGM used its star system to help establish the Golden Age of Hollywood. Mayer was forced out in 1951, and soon television took its toll on the movie business.
In 1948, there was a landmark anti-trust case, U.S. vs. Paramount, wherein the Supreme Court said movie studios couldn’t own the theaters. In fact, that case is often used as a good example of “vertical integration.”
That means if you own business A, you can’t use your position to get control of business B. I can make Eddy Cars, but I can’t say they only run on Eddy Gas.
The effect of this decision is that Loews had to sell off its theaters business.
Now with Amazon buying MGM, the content maker and content distributor are being brought back together again.
I was not aware of this but there are firms in Asia that allow 100-to-1 margin accounts for crypto trading.
Brian Kelly, CEO of BKCM, pointed to firms in Asia such as BitMEX allowing 100-to-1 leverage for cryptocurrency trades. Robinhood does not allow traders to use margin for cryptocurrency, and Coinbase only allows it for professional traders.
“You get this crowd factor — everybody’s liquidation price tends to be somewhat near everyone else’s– when you hit that, all of these automatic sell orders come in, and the price just cascades down,” Kelly, told CNBC.
Bitcoin traders liquidated roughly $12 billion in levered positions last week as the price of the cryptocurrency spiraled, according to bybt.com. This mass exodus wiped out about 800,000 crypto accounts.
“Selling begets more selling until you come to an equilibrium on leverage in the system,” said JMP analyst Devin Ryan. That selling begins to “compound” as leveraged positions are liquidated, because they can’t meet those margin requirements, he said.
“Leverage in the crypto markets — particularly on the retail side — has been a big theme that accentuates the volatility,” Ryan added.
-
Morning News: May 25, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 25th, 2021 at 7:00 amU.S., EU Vow to Pressure Belarus Over Diversion of Ryanair Jet
Airlines Start Skirting Belarus After It Forced Down a Plane
‘Cascade of Calamities’ Plagues Tokyo’s Olympics Ambitions
The Inflation Scare Is Over. The Fed One Is Just Getting Started.
No Commodities ‘Super-Cycle’ But Copper Demand from Green Economy Bright
After M&A Boom via Zoom, Dealmakers Hit the Road as COVID-19 Subsides
Deutsche Bank’s Nightmare Decade Is Gone, But Not Yet Forgotten
Florida, in a First, Will Fine Social Media Companies That Bar Candidates
Apple’s Fortnite Trial Ends With Pointed Questions and a Toast to Popeyes
Amazon Nears Deal to Buy Hollywood Studio MGM
Scrounging for Hits, Hollywood Goes Back to the Video Game Well
The Curious World of NFT Real Estate and Design
Howard Lindzon: Momentum Monday – Down Goes Crypto…Up Goes The Gap?
Cullen Roche: Three Things I Think I Think – Crypto, Crypto, Crypto
Ben Carlson: 4 Lessons From the Crypto Crash & Last Year vs. This Year in the Markets
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: May 24, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 24th, 2021 at 7:03 amThe SPAC Party Gets Going in Europe, This Time With Better Terms
Inside the Race to Avert Disaster at China’s Biggest ‘Bad Bank’
China Targets ‘Speculators and Hoarders’ to Stop Commodity Boom
China Crypto Mining Business Hit by Beijing Crackdown, Bitcoin Tumbles
Mainstream Markets Shrug at Volatile $1 Trillion Crypto Rout
Three Disasters Show Gaps in $1.7 Trillion Infrastructure Plan
The Fed Thinks It Can Have It All: Strong Economy, Job Growth, Stable Inflation
Big Banks Look for Post-Pandemic Rebound of Credit Card Revenue
Daimler’s Truck Unit Maps Plans to Replace Diesel With Hydrogen
How the Pandemic Has Changed Attitudes Toward Wealth
Jeff Carter: Digital US Dollars & 10000=$15=$350000000
Michael Batnick: Houses Have Gotten Bigger and Nicer
Ben Carlson: Did HGTV Ruin the Housing Market For Millennials?
Howard Lindzon: Tiny Bubbles…Seed Stage Edition and Sunday Reads
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: May 21, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 21st, 2021 at 7:04 amU.S. Floats 15% Global Minimum Tax on Corporate Profits
As Paycheck Protection Program Runs Dry, Desperation Grows
Oil Drillers and Bitcoin Miners Bond Over Natural Gas
Soaring Prices Herald Boom Time for Steel Makers
How the Post-Pandemic Labor Crunch is Curbing U.S. Manufacturing
U.S. Can Learn From Others on Managing Climate Finance Risks
How Megafirms Are Eating the World
Irish Hospitals Are Latest to Be Hit by Ransomware Attacks
Cathie Wood Still A Big Buyer of Coinbase, Owns $1 Billion Worth of Shares
The World Might Be Running Low on Americans
Joshua Brown: Of Course They’re Going to Talk About Tapering
Howard Lindzon: Recruiting Never Ends …mParticle Hires Chee Chew
Ben Carlson: On the Benefits of Curiosity
Michael Batnick: Animal Spirits: The Case for Investing in Farmland
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: May 20, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 20th, 2021 at 7:08 amOnce Tech’s Favorite Economist, Now a Thorn in Its Side
China’s Blockchain Stocks Are Avoiding Worst of Bitcoin Carnage
$ASS Coin Billionaire: Tales From the Fringe of the Crypto Craze
Colonial Pipeline CEO Tells Why He Paid Hackers a $4.4 Million Ransom
Microsoft and Apple Wage War on Gadget Right-to-Repair Laws
ByteDance Founder to Step Down as CEO, Hand Over to College Roommate
Brothers Ride the Oat Milk Boom to $448 Million Fortune
Ford’s Electric F-150 Pickup Aims to Be the Model T of E.V.s
How Ford Burned $12 Billion in Brazil
‘It’s Magic What We Do.’ Movie Theaters Get Starry-Eyed Once More.
Dutch Court Orders Carlos Ghosn to Return $6.1 Million to Nissan
Joshua Brown: On the Bright Side
Howard Lindzon: The Draw Of The 200 Day Moving Average
Michael Batnick: My Journey With Bitcoin
Ben Carlson: Crash Rules Everything Around Me
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
Morning News: May 19, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 19th, 2021 at 7:05 amCrypto Tumble Wipes $600 Billion Off Digital Tokens in a Week
What Beijing’s New Crackdown Means for Crypto in China
U.S., Canada, Mexico Hold ‘Robust’ Trade Deal Talks, Downplay Differences
Specter of 1960s Inflation Take-Off Haunts U.S. Economy Today
No Pain, No Gain for Big Funds Hunting the Next Tesla
Banks Always Backed Fossil Fuel Over Green Projects—Until This Year
After Media Detour, AT&T Confronts Old Problems
Target Sales Jump 23% As Exclusive Brands, Curbside Pickup Draw In Shoppers
Ex-TikTok CEO Seen as Contender for Discovery-WarnerMedia Streaming
Burger King to Enter Chicken Sandwich Wars with the Ch’King
Nick Maggiulli: Should You Ever Invest in a Leveraged Index Fund?
Howard Lindzon: Social Leverage Companies In The News Growing and Raising Capital
Joshua Brown: Will Inflation Crash the Stock Market? & Post Traumatic Shopping
Michael Batnick: Inflation Doesn’t Have to Crash the Stock Market & A Shortage of Everything
Ben Carlson: What Advice Would You Offer Newly Minted Dogecoin Millionaires?
Be sure to follow me on Twitter.
-
CWS Market Review – May 18, 2021
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 18th, 2021 at 3:49 pm“I have no idea how this works.” – Dave Portnoy
(This is the free version of CWS Market Review. Don’t forget to sign up for the premium newsletter for $20 per month or $200 for the whole year. Thank you for your support.)
You’re not alone, Dave. I recently said that I’ve been waiting 15 years for Nike (NKE) to pull back. Alas, it’s never hit the bargain bin. The sneaker company only seems to climb higher.
See that flat blue line? That’s actually a 1,075% gain for the S&P 500. It just looks flat in comparison to 26,000% for Nike.
For the overly literal who missed my point, I meant to say that sometimes it’s worth paying a premium for a company. Especially if it’s a premium company. There’s little point in trying to save 15% on the buy while missing the next 1,500% move. Pennywise and billions foolish.
This is a key point in stock analysis. Nike is a wonderful company and by most conventional metrics, it’s over-priced. It’s almost always overpriced. Even now it’s going for 43 times this year’s earnings. Yet it’s still done so well.
What are we missing? When you’re overly focused on a stock’s value you may overlook its most important asset, that being its ability to grow. All investing is at some level growth investing. A good investment may double its P/E Ratio. It’s rare but it happens. But a company often can grow the E in the P/E Ratio (the earnings) by many, many fold.
Here’s a thought exercise. Imagine if you know beforehand that a stock will grow its earnings by tenfold in, say, ten years. Are you going to haggle much over 10 cents on the buy price? I wouldn’t.
Warren Buffett often cites Ben Graham as his mentor. Buffett worked for Graham, and his eldest son is named Howard Graham Buffett. But there’s another inspiration to Buffett’s thinking and that’s Philip Fisher (the father of Ken Fisher). Fisher as much as anyone can be called the father of growth investing. His best-known book is Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits. Fisher stressed the importance of a long-term perspective and buying for growth.
John Train said that Warren Buffett is 85% influenced by Benjamin Graham and 15% by Philip Fisher. That sounds about right. Of course, too much of a focus on growth investing can be a pitfall as well. It can lead you to vastly overpay for a stock. With investing, there’s a magic formula outside of discipline and patience.
I was recently looking at the stock of Celanese (CE). This is one of those big companies that doesn’t get much attention in the trading universe. The company has a market cap of $20 billion and about 8,000 employees. Still, you rarely hear it mentioned in investing circles.
What do they do? Celanese is the world’s leading producer of acetic acid. Sexy, I know. Still, the stock has outperformed Netflix over the past one, two and three years. Who would have guessed that?
The truth is, there are lots of companies like Celanese but too many investors shy away from investing in all but a few well-known stocks. There are thousands of stocks out there and they’re not all overpriced.
A good clue that a company has a strong market position is what I call the nice, smooth earnings line. This is when companies consistently increase their earnings-per-share.
Here’s an example. This is the earnings-per-share history of AmerisourceBergen (ABC).
2005: $0.83
2006: $1.08
2007: $1.31
2008: $1.46
2009: $1.69
2010: $2.17
2011: $2.54
2012: $2.76
2013: $3.14
2014: $3.97
2015: $4.96
2016: $5.62
2017: $5.88
2018: $6.49
2019: $7.09
2020: $7.90
2021: $8.53 (est)
2022: $9.10 (est)
2023: $9.93 (est)Notice how it’s a nice, steady climb.
My Watch List
I’m often asked how I go about finding the stocks for my Buy List. What I do is track a Watch List of about 100 stocks. These are stocks that I generally define as good stocks. They usually have thriving businesses and consistent operating histories.
I think of the stocks on the Watch List as the minor leagues and the Buy List is like getting called up to the majors. I’m constantly adding and deleting names to the Watch List. I’m not terribly disciplined, and the list often grows larger than 120 stocks. That’s too many. I’ve recently pared the list back to 100 stocks.
Here’s a sample of 20 stocks that are currently on my Watch List.
You can see the entire list by joining our premium service.
Stock Focus: Tyler Technologies
I’ll highlight one of the Watch List stocks above. Tyler Technologies (TYL) of Plano, Texas is the largest U.S. software company that’s solely focused on the public sector. That’s a nice market to focus on since the government has deep pockets and it never goes bankrupt.
Tyler’s software comes in handy for a local government trying to manage its mission. This includes dozens of different applications. Local governments have to do a lot from managing payroll and accounting to billing and HR management. Tyler helps smooth the process. More importantly, it controls costs.
Tyler divides its software business into six categories: appraisal and tax software and services, integrated software for courts and justice agencies, enterprise financial software systems, planning/regulatory/maintenance software, public safety software, records/document management software solutions and transportation software solutions for schools.
Tyler has implemented 21,000 installations in more than 10,000 local government agencies. Tyler doesn’t just work in the U.S. The company has aided governments in Canada, Australia and many other countries.
Consider some numbers. The software market for state and local governments is currently at $15 billion per year. In the U.S., the government exists at several levels which means there are thousands of government agencies at the state and local level, plus school districts. Moreover, many of the current systems used by governments are outdated and in desperate need of an upgrade. You’d be shocked to learn how many government offices still use filing cabinets.
It looks like this year Tyler will pass the $1.3 billion revenue mark, plus reach 5,600 employees.
Last year, Tyler’s subscription revenue grew 12.6%. Free cash flow was up over 50%. Approximately 30% to 50% percent of Tyler’s new software clients choose their software-as-a-service (SaaS) model, as new business continues to gradually transition toward subscriptions.
Tyler is very popular with its client base. The company maintains a 98% retention rate. That’s very good when two-thirds of your revenue is recurring subscriptions. The company has a solid balance sheet. Since 2002, Tyler has bought back nearly 28 million shares.
Tyler has impressive plans for growth. The problem with local governments is that they often operate on several disparate systems. In simple terms, they don’t talk to each other. They have no incentive to. Tyler wants to bring them all together. That way, the government can be more efficient and more responsive to their constituents.
Here’s Tyler’s remarkable growth in EPS. Another nice, smooth line:
2012: $1.00
2013: $1.51
2014: $2.09
2015: $2.54
2016: $3.49
2017: $3.92
2018: $4.80
2019: $5.30
2020: $5.52
2021: $6.15 est
2021: $7.09 estLike Nike, I’ve been waiting for Tyler to get clobbered, and we recently got our chance. The stock had an earnings miss for Q4. The shares also got dinged after Tyler went to the bond market to fund some recent acquisitions.
A few weeks ago, Tyler reported Q1 earnings of $1.43 per share which beat the street by 11 cents per share. That was up 14% over last year’s Q1. Not good enough. In March, Tyler was as high as $480 per share. Lately, it’s around $400.
This year’s estimate for $6.15 per share is ambitious but very doable. Best of all, the American Rescue Plan Act has $350 billion earmarked for state and local governments.
This is a strong growth company with a solid moat. I’d like to see TYL come down a lot more. Still, the ghost of Nike shares lost haunts me.
That’s all for now. I’ll have more for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review.
– Eddy
P.S. Don’t forget to sign up for our premium newsletter.
-
My Watch List
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 18th, 2021 at 3:30 pmHere’s my latest Watch List. This is my unofficial list of high-quality stocks I like to follow. If a stock is on this list, then there’s a very good chance that it’s in the upper 5% of well-run companies on Wall Street. This is the elite.
I’m often asked how I go about selecting the stocks for my Buy List. It’s actually very simple. I have this Watch List of stocks and if one of them falls down to a very attractive price, then it becomes a contender for the new Buy List. I like to think of the Watch List as the minor leagues for the Buy List. Strong prospects earn their way up the ladder.
The Watch List is very informal. Unlike the Buy List, I’m constantly adding and deleting names. In fact, I have a bad habit of letting the Watch List grow too large. I often find myself adding three names for every one I delete. Ideally, I like to keep the Watch List below 100 names.
AbbVie (ABBV)
AmerisourceBergen (ABC)
Adobe (ADBE)
Automatic Data Processing (ADP)
AMETEK (AME)
American Tower (AMT)
Anthem (ANTM)
Amphenol (APH)
Atrion (ATRI)
AutoZone (AZO)
Boeing (BA)
Balchem (BCPC)
Brown-Forman (BF-B)
Biogen Inc. (BIIB)
Booking Holdings (BKNG)
Celanese (CE)
Colgate-Palmolive (CL)
Clorox (CLX)
The Cooper Companies, Inc. (COO)
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)
Copart, Inc. (CPRT)
salesforce.com, inc. (CRM)
Cintas Corporation (CTAS)
CVS Health Corporation (CVS)
Ecolab Inc. (ECL)
The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. (EL)
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW)
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD)
Exponent, Inc. (EXPO)
Fastenal Company (FAST)
F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV)
Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO)
General Dynamics Corporation (GD)
General Mills, Inc. (GIS)
Gentex Corporation (GNTX)
Alphabet Inc. (GOOG)
Global Payments Inc. (GPN)
Hingham Institution for Savings (HIFS)
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII)
Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC)
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX)
IDEX Corporation (IEX)
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (IFF)
Intuit Inc. (INTU)
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG)
Gartner, Inc. (IT)
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT)
J & J Snack Foods Corp. (JJSF)
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY)
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
Kellogg Company (K)
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)
Mastercard Incorporated (MA)
Masimo Corporation (MASI)
Medtronic plc (MDT)
McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
Mesa Laboratories, Inc. (MLAB)
3M Company (MMM)
Altria Group, Inc. (MO)
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
Mettler-Toledo International Inc. (MTD)
Neogen Corporation (NEOG)
NIKE, Inc. (NKE)
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)
ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW)
Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO)
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (ODFL)
Oracle Corporation (ORCL)
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY)
Paycom Software, Inc. (PAYC)
Paychex, Inc. (PAYX)
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. (PB)
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL)
ResMed Inc. (RMD)
Rollins, Inc. (ROL)
Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)
Raytheon Technologies Corporation (RTX)
Starbucks Corporation (SBUX)
SEI Investments Company (SEIC)
Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP)
S&P Global Inc. (SPGI)
Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG)
The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX)
Tractor Supply Company (TSCO)
The Toro Company (TTC)
The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD)
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH)
Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL)
Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH)
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM)
Visa Inc. (V)
Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV)
Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)
VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN)
Waters Corporation (WAT)
WD-40 Company (WDFC)
Winmark Corporation (WINA)
Waste Management, Inc. (WM)
Watsco, Inc.(WSO)
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW)
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH)
-
-
Archives
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005