• Dow XMM
    Posted by on January 26th, 2011 at 11:15 am

    Shortly after 10 am this morning, the Dow traded above 12,000 for the first time since June 20, 2008:

  • Abbott Labs Earns $1.30 Per Share
    Posted by on January 26th, 2011 at 9:35 am

    This morning, Abbott Labs (ABT) reported Q4 earnings of $1.30 per share which beat Wall Street’s forecast by a penny. Sales for the quarter rose by 13% to just shy of $10 billion.

    One of the reasons I like Abbott is that the stock has been weighed down by some bad news recently. In the past few months, the company had to pull a diet drug off the market. That was actually good news compared to when Abbott had to pull its baby formula off the market due to contamination from…wait for it…insect parts.

    Despite the bad news, this is a very solid company. Drug sales, which make up about 60% of ABT’s business, surged 23% in Q4. For all of 2011, ABT said it expects earnings-per-share between $4.54 and $4.64 per share. That gives Abbott a forward P/E of about 10.4 which is a very good value.

  • Morning News: January 26, 2011
    Posted by on January 26th, 2011 at 7:53 am

    Dollar Falls Against Yen, Euro; FOMC Eyed

    Davos: Cautious CEOs Counting on BRICs for Growth

    Davos: As Europe Toils on Debt, U.S. and Japan Watch Nervously

    Obama Calls for Lowering Corporate Tax Rates, Closing Loopholes

    Obama on Debt: What He Said and What He Didn’t Say

    Roubini Says U.S. Risks ‘Train Wreck’ From Bond Vigilante Wrath

    Bernanke Gets 66% Approval From Investors Disliking QE2

    Financial Crisis Was Avoidable, Inquiry Finds

    Mortgage Applications in U.S. Fall to Lowest Level in Two Years

    California Default Notices Drop in Fourth Quarter

    Yahoo Profit Rises Even as Sales Dip 4%

    Paul Kedrosky: Apple’s Near-Field Communications Venture Outed

    Joshua Brown: Obama Says the Magic Words

  • Earnings for Stryker and Gilead Sciences
    Posted by on January 25th, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    After the bell, we had earnings reports from Stryker (SYK) and Gilead Sciences (GILD).

    For Q4, Stryker earned 93 cents per share which was two cents ahead of expectations. Revenues rose 9% to $1.99 billion. This was a very solid quarter for SYK. I really like this stock.

    For the year, Stryker earned $3.33 per share. Stryker recently said that it expects EPS for this year to range from $3.65 to $3.73. The stock is down about 1.5% after-hours.

    Gilead earned 95 cents per share after charges which was a penny ahead of expectations. For all of 2010, Gilead earned $3.32 per share on sales of $7.39 billion. The AP has some details:

    The company said revenue from its antiviral drugs rose 5 percent to $1.7 billion during the quarter. Sales of its three-in-one HIV drug Atripla grew 11 percent to $775.2 million, while sales of Truvada increased 2 percent to $681.7 million and sales of the HIV and hepatitis B drug Viread rose 7 percent to $191.1 million.

    Revenue from Gilead’s pulmonary arterial hypertension drug Letairis increased 23 percent to $64 million, and sales of its chronic angina drug Ranexa climbed 47 percent to $67.8 million. Sales of its other products dipped 6 percent to $150.4 million. Royalty, contract, and other revenue plunged 70 percent to $68.5 million. That was mostly because of the sharp drop in sales of the flu treatment Tamiflu compared to last year. Swiss drugmaker Roche pays royalties to Gilead on sales of the drug.

    Tamiflu royalty payments fell 89 percent to $21.9 million.

    Gilead also announced Tuesday that the Food and Drug Administration did not accept its application for approval of a new HIV therapy. The drug, which Gilead developed with Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, is a single tablet combining Truvada with Tibotec’s drug candidate rilpivirine.

    Gilead said the FDA wants more information, which the company plans to provide by the end of this quarter.

    After hours, the shares are down $1.06 or 2.78%. Wall Street currently expects Gilead to earn $4.06 per share next year which gives GILD a forward P/E of 9.4.

  • Apple’s Stock and Earnings
    Posted by on January 25th, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    In response to yesterday’s chart on Google (GOOG), A number of you asked to see a similar chart for Apple (AAPL). Like Jeeves, I endeavor to give satisfaction.

    Once again, the lines are scaled at a ratio of 20-to-1. I’m not saying that’s the proper earnings multiple; I merely think that’s the clearest way to present the data. You can also see how modest Wall Street’s earnings projections are compared with the recent trend.

  • Jim Simons
    Posted by on January 25th, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    Via Paul Kedrosky, here’s Jim Simons of Renaissance Technologies. (Hearing him speak, Simons always reminds me of a minor character on Seinfeld.)

  • JNJ Earns $1.03 Per Share
    Posted by on January 25th, 2011 at 10:20 am

    Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) released earnings this morning and they were a very slight disappointment. The company earned $1.03 per share which was inline with expectations.

    Technically, the company earned 70 cents per share, but the company’s net was dragged down by recall and litigation costs.

    J&J’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare division has recalled more than 40 brands of over- the-counter medicines, including Tylenol and Rolaids, since late 2009, and the company removed orthopedic implants last year. J&J said the consumer recalls cut 2010 sales by about $900 million dollars, about $300 million more the company projected in July.

    The recalls made 2010 a “difficult and disappointing” year, Chief Executive Officer William Weldon said on a conference call with analysts. J&J is in the midst of an “uncompromising effort” to improve quality and restore trust in its brands, he said.

    “If those reviews reveal any further issues, we will not hesitate to take any action that is needed,” Weldon said.

    Johnson & Johnson also released their earnings estimate for this year: $4.80 to $4.90 per share. Wall Street had been expecting $4.98 per share, so this was a bit below expectations.

    The stock is down about $1 per share this morning. Today’s news is disappointing but not earthshaking. JNJ is the bluest of the blue chips so I see any pullback as a good opportunity to buy.

  • Morning News: January 25, 2011
    Posted by on January 25th, 2011 at 8:37 am

    Euro Reaches Two-Month High on Growth Signs, Confidence in Debt Resolution

    I.M.F. Says European Debt Still a Threat to World Recovery

    Fed Likely to Press On With QE Even as Business Lending Rises

    A Hefty Price for Entry to Davos

    DuPont Profit Drops Less Than Expected; 2011 Forecast Raised

    Corning 4Q Profit Rises 41% As Demand Improves

    BlackRock Profit Doubles as Stock Rally Lifts Assets

    Regions Financial Swings To Surprise 4Q Profit On Higher Reveues

    American Express 4Q Profit Increases

    Harley-Davidson Loss Narrows on Financial Unit Gain

    Coach Profit up 26% as U.S. and China Sales Soar

    Joshua Brown: The New and Improved Barron’s Boost

    Paul Kedrosky: The Re-Rise of Copper Thefts

  • Google’s Stock to $750?
    Posted by on January 24th, 2011 at 1:26 pm

    I’m often asked my opinion of Google’s (GOOG) stock so I wanted to share some thoughts with you.

    Generally, I prefer to steer clear of highly popular stocks. The research is very clear that stocks with high betas are not strong performers. Also, with so many eyes following Google, I’d have a very hard time gaining an edge over the market. That’s why I like to hunt for bargains where other folks don’t go.

    I have to give Google credit; their earnings have grown very impressively. Earnings are currently growing about 20% to 25% which is hard to match anywhere.

    The problem I have is that I don’t know how to properly value a company whose earnings are growing so rapidly. With 20/20 hindsight, we can say that Google was a great buy at its IPO. The shares then ran up to $700 by late 2007. The peak close came at $741.79 on November 6, 2007.

    Since then, Google has basically been a market performer — and the market has been a poor performer. Given its volatility, I’d say that owning Google hasn’t been worth the trouble over the last three years.

    What Google has done is pretty interesting since the stock went from a very high valuation to a more reasonable one (though still high), while the stock has generally kept pace with the market. The E of the P/E Ratio has grown by enough to offset the overall decline in Google’s P/E Ratio.

    Below is a look at Google’s stock in blue (left scale) and its earnings-per-share in gold (right scale). The red is Wall Street’s projection. I’ve scaled the two lines at a ratio of 20 to 1 so whenever the lines cross, the P/E Ratio is exactly 20.

    A few things to note: Notice how much higher the stock was compared with its earnings in early 2008. The P/E Ratio was over 40.

    See the slight slowing of Google’s earnings growth in 2009? The recession barely hit them but it is noticeable.

    Finally, you can really see how modest Wall Street’s earnings projection is compared with the recent trend. Just by mentally extending the gold line, I can see earnings hitting $35 per share this year. My current estimate is for $35.61 per share.

    The stock’s P/E Ratio has averaged 21 over the past few years. Given my earnings estimate, that translates to a price one year from now of $747.81 per share. Given the current price, Google is a good value.

  • Real GDP Plunged 0.00004% in 2008
    Posted by on January 24th, 2011 at 10:49 am

    Here’s an odd statistical note:

    In 2007, GDP in chained millions of dollars came in at $13,228,853. In 2008, it dropped to $13,228,848.

    That’s a drop of 0.00004%.

    That means that 200-million plus consumers made countless economic decisions every day for a year and the total output for two consecutive years was almost perfectly identical.

    Few things are as surprising as the past.

    In 2009, real GDP fell by 2.6%. This Friday we’ll get the GDP for the fourth quarter of 2010. Real GDP probably grew around 2.8% to 3.0% last year.