The S&P 500 and Its Dividends
Here’s an update of a chart of the S&P 500 and its dividends. The S&P 500 is the blue line and it follows the left scale. The dividends are in red and they follow the right scale. I scaled the two axes at a ratio of 50-to-1. This means that anytime the lines cross, the dividend yield is exactly 2%.
I wouldn’t place the market’s dividend yield as one of my top valuation variables, but it’s still worth looking at the market’s relationship to its dividend payouts. First, there’s a purity to dividends. You never really know what a company’s cash flow or earnings are. But if a company is willing to part with money, then you know it’s real.
I also like how stable dividends are. That really stands out in this chart. While the market had frenetic rallies and plunges, the dividends are fairly steady.
By looking at dividends, you can see how the market went from being very underpriced in the early 1990s to wildly overpriced by the late 1990s. There are a few lessons. I think there was a secular lowering of dividends up to 2000. As recently as 20 years ago, the market’s dividend was at 4%. That’s unthinkable today. By the time the bubble peaked in 2000, the overall yield was close to 1%. Even after the air came out of the bubble, the yield barely hit 2% (see how the lines touched in late 2002).
I think it’s also interesting that the market’s rally from 2003 to 2007 basically mirrored the rise in dividends. There was a bubble in housing and other sectors, but general stock valuations were well within historical context.
The drop in dividends after 2007 is overstated thanks to the dramatic cutting of dividends in financial companies. We’re probably going to see many dividend increases this year. JPMorgan Chase (JPM), for example, can easily triple its dividend without breaking a sweat.
Even with the big drop in dividends, it’s dwarfed by the plunge in stock prices. I think it’s likely the 2% will be the New Normal for dividends.
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 11th, 2011 at 12:16 pm
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
-

Named by