Microsoft Looks Inexpensive Here
A year ago, I asked if Microsoft ($MSFT) was a value stock, and I think the answer was yes. This, of course, would have been a big shock to any investor 15 years ago. But times have changed. Unfortunately, the company has made many mistakes over the years and younger rivals are doing to them what they once did to IBM ($IBM).
One such example would be…IBM.
But as shrewd investors, we need to look past some blemishes to find true value. Oftentimes, good stocks to buy come with dents on them. The questions are, how serious are they and at what price?
Shares of MSFT are taking a small hit today on the news that the head of Windows is out. Microsoft also had a poor earnings report a few weeks ago. The stock is currently at $27.09.
Let’s look at some numbers. Microsoft is expected to earn $3.21 per share for next year’s calendar year. Microsoft’s fiscal year ends in June, but I’m using the calendar year for easier comparisons. This means that Microsoft is going for just 8.4 times earnings while the S&P 500 is going for 12.2 times next year’s earnings. That’s a steep discount.
Meanwhile, Microsoft continues to generate strong cash flow. I really like that they bumped up their quarterly dividend by 15% (from 20 to 23 cents per share) a few weeks ago. That brings the yield up to 3.4%. Going by my simple valuation formula, Microsoft has a fair value of $40.
I can’t say that Microsoft will hit its fair value. That’s just a rough guess. The stock, of course, can keep going down. But if investors collect a diversified portfolio of several stocks going for good prices, over time, they should do well.
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on November 13th, 2012 at 11:10 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
-

Named by