How Much is Facebook Worth?
So now that Facebook ($FB) is public, is the stock a good buy?
The short answer is no. The longer answer is noooooooo.
First we have to consider the fact that no company has ever gone public because they thought their share price was too low. That shouldn’t dismiss every initial public offering, but it’s an important consideration to keep in mind. As a general rule, IPOs are bad buys.
The other fact is that it’s very difficult to evaluate the prospects of a young company in a new industry. I have a pretty good idea of how quickly Medtronic ($MDT) will grow its earnings over the next few years. I can’t say the same for Facebook. More than 12 years after its peak, Yahoo’s ($YHOO) share price is barely one-eighth its price. Things didn’t turn out as they were planned.
We also know that FB’s underwriters spent enormous amounts of money trying to keep the stock price above $38 on Friday.
Some market participants said that the underwriters had to absorb mountains of stock to defend the $38 level and keep the market from dipping below it.
The firm did this by tapping into a 63 million share over-allotment option, or greenshoe, according to sources familiar with the deal.
As an indication of the cost, had Morgan Stanley bought all of the shares traded around $38 in the final 20 minutes of the day, it would have spent nearly $2 billion. Underwriters are not obligated to prop up a stock on debut, but typically do.
Morgan Stanley declined to comment.
I don’t see why it’s so embarrassing for FB to drop below its offering price. Or at least why that embarrassment is worth more than $2 billion. As a side note, I’m also not bothered by the delay in starting trading in Facebook. That’s slightly embarrassing, but I’d rather that they get it right rather than get it on time. Big deal; traders can wait 20 minutes.
Now let’s look at some of the projections about Facebook and we’ll use our World’s Simplest Stock Valuation Method. Wall Street currently thinks the company will earn 60 cents per share next year. Henry Blodget thinks that’s way too low and that FB can earn $1 per share in 2013. I think that’s a much more reasonable assumption.
I haven’t seen any estimates of Facebook’s five-year growth rate so we’ll have to use some creativity here. We do know that Facebook’s growth rate is falling, but of course that’s from unsustainable levels to more realistic ones. One hint is that last quarter the company grew its revenue by 44%.
To be safe, let’s use a 50% earnings growth rate for the next five year. That’s almost certainly too high, but again, we’re being safe.
The World Simplest Stock Valuation Method is:
Price/Earnings Ratio = Growth Rate/2 + 8
So that works out to:
33 = 50/2 + 8
And with a $1 per share estimate for next year, that works out to a fair value of $33. So by using numbers very favorable to Facebook we can see that the stock is overpriced. On top of that, as a prudent investor, I wouldn’t be interested in Facebook unless it’s going for 30% below Fair Value. That’s about $23 per share.
For now, I’m keeping my distance from Facebook.
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on May 21st, 2012 at 8:26 am
The information in this blog post represents my own opinions and does not contain a recommendation for any particular security or investment. I or my affiliates may hold positions or other interests in securities mentioned in the Blog, please see my Disclaimer page for my full disclaimer.
-
- Tweets by @EddyElfenbein
-
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
-

Named by