The Onion Scoops Wall Street
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 15th, 2005 at 12:23 pm

The Onion
February 18, 2004

Fuck Everything, We’re Doing Five Blades

CNN/Money
September 14, 2005

Gillette unveils 5-bladed razor

Google Prices Shares at $295
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 15th, 2005 at 9:40 am

Google priced its follow-on offering at $295. The 14-million-share offering raises over $4 billion for the search engine. This is larger than its IPO last year which raised $1.7 billion on 19.6 million shares. Impressively, the stock is up since the follow-on offering was announced.

Google hasn’t given specific plans for the money. Since the company is cash-flow positive and it already has a sizable cash position, I assume Google will use the money for acquisitions. Yahoo and eBay have been busy on the acquisition front. Microsoft has $38 billion in cash, while eBay, Google and Yahoo all have about $3 billion. A lot of people think Google will now buy Baidu. Google already owns a small stake of Baidu.

Delta and Northwest File for Bankruptcy
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 15th, 2005 at 9:20 am

It finally happened. Delta and Northwest have filed for bankruptcy. Both companies said the timing was a coincidence. Now, four of the seven largest airlines are in bankruptcy protection. In the last four years, the big airlines have lost $30 billion.
What does this mean for ticket holders? Edward Hasbrouck’s Practical Nomad blog has advice for travelers, including an “FAQ about Airline Bankruptcies.”

Rating Brokers
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 15th, 2005 at 9:03 am

Smart Money recently had a review of online brokers. I use Ameritrade (soon to become TD Ameritrade) which is pretty good for my needs, although the “account” screen is a bit confusing.

For premium discounters, Smart Money likes Fidelity. Harrisdirect was their top basic discount broker. They also give high marks to OptionsXpress.

About full-service firms, Smart Money said:

Whether you are thinking about making the move to a full-service broker or are frustrated with the one you have because he doesn’t return your calls, it helps to understand the economics of the business. “If the account is not more than $250,000, it becomes difficult for the brokerage to make money,” says Brad Hintz, a brokerage analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein. Accounts below that level get “generic support” from a call center, he says. And when it comes to the big firms, say, UBS or Smith Barney, Hintz is probably lowballing that estimate. Some brokers we spoke with said their services are aimed at clients who bring half a million dollars to the table. Of course, if you want your broker to join you on the beach, it’ll take a bit more.

Of the full-service firms, Smart Money gives its highest rating to Edward Jones.

Banks Vs. Brokers
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 14th, 2005 at 3:19 pm

I thought summer was supposed to be a slow time on Wall Street. Apparently, no one told Lehman Brothers. The company reported great earnings today. Profits jumped 74%. Lehman earned $2.94 a share, well above Wall Street’s estimate of $2.37. The company sees its earnings growing 10% next year, and 8% in the year after that. With the new results, the stock is going for about 11 times earnings.

To be sure, this is the latest in a string of good quarters for Lehman, which has benefited from a robust bond environment in recent years, combined with a decision by management to further diversify its business into areas such as stock trading and investment banking. David Goldfarb, Lehman’s chief administrative officer, told analysts that the market environment was favorable in the third quarter, which helped boost the firm’s earnings.

It will be interesting to see how well the other big brokers do when they report their earnings. What I find interesting is how much better the brokers are doing than the major banks. These stocks usually track each other pretty closely, but the brokers have taken a solid lead in the past few months.

This chart shows how the brokers (the gold line) have climbed higher since May, while the banks (the black line) have barely moved.

Writing a Check
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 14th, 2005 at 9:25 am

Here’s an odd fact for you. Did you know that you can write a legal check on any old piece of paper?

According to the Uniform Commercial Code, the body of law that governs these things, all you have to include are the name of the payee, the dollar amount, the name of your bank, your signature, the date, and some suitable words of conveyance, such as “pay to the order of.” You don’t need the account number or the bank ID number you find on preprinted checks.
The trick is that you have to find somebody willing to accept such a check. Merchants and the like are free to reject any sort of payment they don’t cotton to, checks included. Needless to say, if you try to write a check on the back of an old grocery list, the average checkout clerk is going to tell you to take a hike. However, if the clerk does accept it, the bank will honor it.

Jaffray and Goldman Rate Baidu as Underperform
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 14th, 2005 at 9:13 am

Two of Baidu.com’s underwriters, Goldman Sachs and Piper Jaffray, have rated the stock as “underperform” today. Goldman even said that the company is worth just $27, which is the same as its IPO price. Yesterday, shares of Baidu closed at $113, and it’s been as high as $153. On its first day of trading, the stock jumped 345%.

Anthony Noto, the Goldman analyst, said that at the most extreme, Baidu could be worth $45 a share.

Noto’s forecasting growth rates of 35% for revenue and 40% for earnings per share between 2006 and 2009. In 2006 alone, the Goldman Sachs analyst estimates Baidu.com will see earnings-per-share growth of 106% on a 71% jump in revenue.
Noto bases his forecast on the company’s solid results to date and on an exploding Chinese market.
“By 2008, the number of Internet users in China should reach 252 million, surpassing that of the U.S. despite only representing 19% of the expected population at that time vs. 71% for the U.S,” said Noto. “These strong secular growth trends provide a positive backdrop for Baidu.”

Baidu’s stock is currently down about 24% in pre-market trading.

The S&P Since 2004
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 13th, 2005 at 5:21 pm

This has not been an equal-opportunity market. Since the beginning of 2004, the S&P 500 is up 10.73%. However, it’s been largely led by two sectors–the Energy Sector is up 72.8% and the Utilities Sector is up 41.06%. The rest of the market has been pretty much flat.
Energy 72.80%
Utilities 41.06%
Industrials 11.75%
Telecom 7.28%
Staples 6.35%
Discretionary 6.07%
Healthcare 5.58%
Financials 4.79%
Materials 2.91%
Tech 2.59%

Reuters: Northwest shares plunge as bankruptcy looms
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 13th, 2005 at 4:02 pm

The end may be near for Northwest.

Shares of Northwest Airlines plunged 58 percent on Tuesday following a press report that the No. 4 U.S. carrier could file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as early as Wednesday.
The New York Times, citing anonymous sources, said both Northwest and No. 3 carrier Delta Air Lines were very close to filing.
“The shares are down obviously on the New York Times article. That’s the only news that came out before the stock before the stock began to fall,” said Helane Becker, an analyst at Benchmark Cos.
“I think that they will file before October 17 for sure. With oil prices where they are and big pension contributions due, and without higher airfares, Northwest had no choice,” Becker said.
Shares of Northwest were down 57.7 percent, or $1.91, to $1.40 in afternoon trade on Nasdaq.

Replay of 10 Years Ago?
Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on September 13th, 2005 at 3:48 pm

I normally don’t pay attention to these kinds of historical parallels, but there’s a strong similarity between today’s market and the market of 10 years ago. Both markets are stuck in trading ranges and both have very low volatilities.

Here’s the S&P 500 from November 1992 to February 1995:

And here’s the S&P 500 since December 2003:

I keep thinking that the market will break out of its trading range, but it never seems to. Each time we get close to a new high, the market backs off. What turned the market around in 1995 was a rally in the bond market. I don’t think we’ll get that again, but stranger things have happened.