Crossing Wall Street
  • Home
  • About
  • Buy List
  • ETF
  • Top Posts
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

  • Morning News: June 14, 2019
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 14th, 2019 at 7:04 am

    As Trade War Hits, China Factories See Slowest Growth Since 2002

    How Tanker Attacks in the Strait of Hormuz Could Affect Oil Prices

    Boeing’s Decision on New Jet Is Critical in Rivalry With Airbus

    Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency, Libra, Gets Big Backers

    PetSmart’s Chewy Gets Wall Street Tails Wagging with $1 Billion IPO

    Broadcom Falls After Cutting Its Chip Sales Guidance: 6 Key Takeaways

    Who Are You Calling Chicken? Tyson Foods is Getting into the Business of Plant-Based Meat

    Does Amazon Really Pay No Taxes? Here’s the Complicated Answer

    Manhattan’s Newest Flagship Department Stores Are Ignoring the Retail Apocalypse

    Stanford Team Aims at Alexa and Siri With a Privacy-Minded Alternative

    Volkswagen to Float 10% of Truck Unit, Seeks to Raise 1.9 Billion Euros

    Hey, Raptors Fans, You Want Fries With Those 3-Pointers?

    Roger Nusbaum: Putting a Price Tag on Happiness

    Jeff Miller: Do You Evaluate Your Trading Mistakes?

    Ben Carlson: David Swensen & a Target Date Fund Walk Into a Bar

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • Morning News: June 13, 2019
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2019 at 7:56 am

    Oil Surges as Tankers in Gulf Suffer Another Suspected Attack

    Is Bitcoin Growing Up? Regulated Futures Boom as Investors Seek a Safer Ride

    Hong Kong’s Financial Elite Grow Uneasy as China Tensions Rise

    The Fed Needs to Be the Adult in the Economy

    As Trade War With U.S. Grinds On, Chinese Tourists Stay Away

    Social Security Is Staring at Its First Real Shortfall in Decades. Big Cuts Could Follow.

    Alibaba Files for a Hong Kong Mega-Listing

    Huawei Files to Trademark Mobile OS Around the World After U.S. Ban

    Mitsubishi Envisions More Comfortable Regional Flights on its New ‘SpaceJet’

    Here’s What FedEx’s Breakup With Amazon Means

    Investors Pumped Billions Into Suburbs That Never Got Built

    Store’s Bid to Shame Customers Over Plastic Bags Backfires

    Petrobras Ignored Warnings About Fuel Broker Implicated in Graft Probe

    Joshua Brown: The Big Kickoff & A 2% Tax on America’s 75,000 Wealthiest Families Would Raise $2.75 Trillion

    Michael Batnick: More Art Than Science, Dad Cat Bounce & Operational Momentum

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • Another Tame Inflation Report
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 12th, 2019 at 12:55 pm

    The CPI report came out this morning and it was another tame report. For May, consumer prices rose just 0.1%. That matched Wall Street’s expectations. That’s after a 0.3% rise in April. In the last year, consumer prices are up 1.9%.

    The core rate, which excludes food and energy, was also up 0.1%. In the last year, the core rate is up 2.0%.

    Gasoline prices fell 0.5% in May after rising 5.7% in April. Food prices rebounded 0.3% in May after dipping 0.1% in the prior month. Food consumed at home increased 0.3% last month.

    Owners’ equivalent rent of primary residence, which is what a homeowner would pay to rent or receive from renting a home, increased 0.3% in May after rising 0.3% in April.

    Healthcare costs increased 0.3%, matching April’s rise. The solid increase in healthcare costs at both the consumer and production levels last month suggests a pickup in the core PCE price index in May.

    The cost of hospital services increased 0.5% in May and the cost of doctor visits ticked up 0.1%. But the prices for prescription medication fell 0.2%.

    Apparel prices were unchanged in May after tumbling 0.8% in the prior month. They had declined for two months in a row after the government introduced a new method and data to calculate apparel prices.

    Prices for used motor vehicles and trucks tumbled 1.4%. That was the largest drop since last September and marked the fourth straight monthly decrease. The cost of motor vehicle insurance fell 0.4%, the most since May 2007. There were also decreases in the cost of recreation.

    But prices for airline tickets, household furnishings and new vehicles rose last month. Household furnishings are likely to trend higher in the coming months because of U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision in early May to slap additional tariffs of up to 25% on $200 billion of Chinese goods.

    Here’s the real Fed funds rate based on core inflation.

  • Morning News: June 12, 2019
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 12th, 2019 at 7:13 am

    Hong Kong Markets Roiled by Interbank Rate Squeeze Amid Protests

    Iran Scrambles to Lift Petrochemical Sales as Sanctions Hammer Oil

    Ten U.S. States Sue to Stop Sprint-T-Mobile Deal, Saying Consumers Will Be Hurt

    House Opens Tech Antitrust Inquiry With Look at Threat to News Media

    Dassault to Buy Medidata in $5.7 Billion Health Data Push

    Highlights from Tesla’s Annual Meeting

    Your iPhone Is Already Made in America

    Facebook’s New Study App Pays Adults for Data After Teen Scandal

    Grubhub Stock Gets a Boost on Amazon’s Exit From Food Delivery

    GE’s Larry Culp Faces Ultimate CEO Test in Trying to Save a Once-Great Company

    A Krispy Kreme in Times Square Will Have Stadium-Style Seats and a Glaze Waterfall

    Kraft Introduces ‘Salad Frosting’ to Help Trick Your Kids Into Eating More Vegetables

    Nick Maggiulli: Being Wrong When You Get It Right

    Cullen Roche: Three Charts I Think I’m Thinking About

    Jeff Carter: If You Immigrate, You Can’t Bank

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • Morning News: June 11, 2019
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 11th, 2019 at 7:18 am

    U.S. Job Openings Outnumber Unemployed by Widest Gap Ever

    Trump Says Mexico Tariffs Worked, Emboldening Trade Fight With China

    China Says Will Respond if U.S. Escalates Trade Tension

    Chinese Tech Giant Huawei Hints That U.S. Pressure Is Hurting Sales

    Top Japanese Chip Gear Firm to Honor U.S. Blacklist of Chinese Firms

    Apple’s U.S. iPhones Can All Be Made Outside of China If Needed

    Expedia Is Undervalued In A Recession Resistant Industry

    Salesforce Dreams of Being Microsoft or Oracle

    Amazon: Impact Of Increasing Rivalry With FedEx

    Nissan and Renault Lock Horns as Relationship Sours Further

    Deutsche Bank Tax Probe Targets About 80 Current, Former Staff

    Howard Lindzon: Momentum Monday – We Don’t Need No Stinking Tariffs

    Ben Carlson: Managing Money vs. Managing Wealth & Talk Your Book: The Net Lease REIT ETF

    Joshua Brown: Get Used To It & Trump on the Fed: They’re Disruptive

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • CNBC’s Interview with Raytheon’s and UT’s CEOs
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 10th, 2019 at 12:06 pm

    Watch CNBC’s full interview with the CEOs of United Technologies and Raytheon from CNBC.

  • Trump Is Concerned about the Raytheon Deal
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 10th, 2019 at 12:02 pm

    From CNBC:

    President Donald Trump on Monday said he has concerns that a merger between United Technologies and Raytheon would harm competition and make it more difficult for the U.S. government to negotiate defense contracts.

    “I’m a little concerned about United Technologies and Raytheon,” Trump said in an exclusive interview with CNBC. Aerospace companies have “all merged in so it’s hard to negotiate” with them, he added, suggesting the defense industry could be heading in the same direction.

    Asked whether he would have problems with the merger, Trump replied, “Only if they have the same products. That would be the thing that bothers me most.”

    (…)

    “We are complementary, not competitive,” Raytheon CEO Tom Kennedy told CNBC in an interview. “I don’t know the last time we competed against United Technologies.”

    Greg Hayes, United Technologies’ CEO and chairman who is slated to be CEO of the new company, once the merger closes, said he looked forward “to talking to the president later today,” about potential job growth under the deal.

    Still, the president repeatedly expressed concerns about dwindling competition in aerospace.

    “When I hear United and I hear Raytheon, when I hear they’re merging, does that make it less competitive? It’s already not competitive,” Trump said.

    “I just want to see competition. They’re two great companies, I love them both. But I want to see that we don’t hurt our competition.”

  • Morning News: June 10, 2019
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 10th, 2019 at 7:07 am

    U.K. Economy Shrinks as Factory Output Falls Most Since 2002

    Argentina’s Economic Misery Could Bring Populism Back to the Country

    China Summons Tech Giants to Warn Against Cooperating With Trump Ban

    Mnuchin Dashes Investor Dreams of Quick Fannie-Freddie Windfall

    Wall Street Asks When, Not if, the Fed Will Cut Interest Rates

    United Technologies, Raytheon to Combine as Defense Giant

    Some Big Tech Firms Cut Employees’ Access to Huawei, Muddying 5G Rollout

    A Billboard No. 1 Is at Stake, So Here’s an Album With Your Taylor Swift Hoodie

    Renault Rift with Nissan Widens Over Governance, Casts Shadow on Alliance

    Employees Sour on Tesla Amid Cost-Cutting, Layoffs

    3 Reasons to Retire as Early as You Can

    ‘Trade of Our Lives’: After Mueller, UBS Banker Faces Questions

    Michael Batnick: Talk Your Book: The Net Lease REIT & Ackshually…

    Jeff Carter: Network Effects and Venture Capital & SEC and Kik

    Jeff Miller: Weighing the Week Ahead: Should Investors Bank on the Fed?

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • It’s Official: Raytheon and United Technologies to Merge
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 10th, 2019 at 6:09 am

    The deal is expected to close in the first half of next year. The combined company will be called Raytheon Technologies. The deal is all cash. RTN shareholders will get 2.3348 shares of the new company for every one they own now.

    Here’s the press release:

    Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) and United Technologies Corp. (NYSE: UTX) have entered into an agreement to combine in an all-stock merger of equals. The transaction will create a premier systems provider with advanced technologies to address rapidly growing segments within aerospace and defense. The merger of Raytheon, a leading defense company, and United Technologies, a leading aerospace company, comprised of Collins Aerospace and Pratt & Whitney, will offer a complementary portfolio of platform-agnostic aerospace and defense technologies. The combined company, which will be named Raytheon Technologies Corporation, will offer expanded technology and R&D capabilities to deliver innovative and cost-effective solutions aligned with customer priorities and the national defense strategies of the U.S. and its allies and friends. The combination excludes Otis and Carrier, which are expected to be separated from United Technologies in the first half of 2020 as previously announced.

    The combined company will have approximately $74 billion in pro forma 2019 sales. With a strong balance sheet and robust cash generation, Raytheon Technologies will enjoy enhanced resources and financial flexibility to support significant R&D and capital investment through business cycles.

    Under the terms of the agreement, which was unanimously approved by the Boards of Directors of both companies, Raytheon shareowners will receive 2.3348 shares in the combined company for each Raytheon share. Upon completion of the merger, United Technologies shareowners will own approximately 57 percent and Raytheon shareowners will own approximately 43 percent of the combined company on a fully diluted basis. The merger is expected to close in the first half of 2020, following completion by United Technologies of the previously announced separation of its Otis and Carrier businesses. The timing of the separation of Otis and Carrier is not expected to be affected by the proposed merger and remains on track for completion in the first half of 2020. The merger is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

    “Today is an exciting and transformational day for our companies, and one that brings with it tremendous opportunity for our future success. Raytheon Technologies will continue a legacy of innovation with an expanded aerospace and defense portfolio supported by the world’s most dedicated workforce,” said Tom Kennedy, Raytheon Chairman and CEO. “With our enhanced capabilities, we will deliver value to our customers by anticipating and addressing their most complex challenges, while delivering significant value to shareowners.”

    “The combination of United Technologies and Raytheon will define the future of aerospace and defense,” said Greg Hayes, United Technologies Chairman and CEO. “Our two companies have iconic brands that share a long history of innovation, customer focus and proven execution. By joining forces, we will have unsurpassed technology and expanded R&D capabilities that will allow us to invest through business cycles and address our customers’ highest priorities. Merging our portfolios will also deliver cost and revenue synergies that will create long-term value for our customers and shareowners.”

  • WSJ: “Raytheon, United Technologies in Talks to Merge”
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 9th, 2019 at 6:27 am

    This is big. From the WSJ:

    United Technologies and Raytheon are in talks to combine in an all-stock deal that would create a giant in the aerospace and defense industries, according to a person familiar with the matter.

    The companies, which together have a market value of roughly $166 billion, could announce a deal in the coming days assuming talks don’t fall apart at the last minute, the person said.

    Exact terms couldn’t be learned but United Technologies shareholders are likely to own a majority of the combined company.

    The tie-up, expected to be billed as a merger-of-equals, wouldn’t affect United Technologies’ existing plans to spin off its Otis elevator and Carrier building-systems businesses into separate companies. Raytheon would be combining with United’s remaining aerospace business, and all transactions would take place at the same time. United Technologies has said the spinoffs will take place in the first half of next year.

    Adjusting for the spinoffs, the companies’ combined market value would likely still be north of $100 billion. The new entity would be the world’s second-largest aerospace-and-defense company by sales after Boeing, with annual revenue of more than $70 billion last year.

    In addition to other benefits from increased scale, the proposed deal could help the enlarged company weather any slowdown in the commercial aerospace and defense markets.

    United Technologies Chairman and Chief Executive Greg Hayes is expected to lead the combined company, while Raytheon Chairman and CEO Thomas Kennedy would be chairman, the person said.

    United Technologies has a market value of roughly $114 billion, while Raytheon’s is about $52 billion.

    The deal would be one of the largest in a year that has included some big mergers but otherwise has been lackluster. Right now the biggest proposed acquisition is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.’s $74 billion purchase of rival drugmaker Celgene Corp.

    A United Technologies-Raytheon combination has long been speculated on by analysts and investors, given that the two companies operate in mainly different segments and could benefit from sharing technology.

    It would unite the maker of Pratt & Whitney engines—used on commercial airliners such as the Airbus SE A320neo—and the F-35 combat jet, with Raytheon, the fourth-largest U.S. defense contractor by revenue.

    (…)

    Waltham, Mass.-based Raytheon, whose sales rose 6.7% last year to $27.1 billion, produces missiles such as the Tomahawk together with radars and other electronic-warfare systems. It has invested heavily in recent years ahead of the recent uptick in Pentagon spending, and has the biggest export business among the five largest U.S. defense contractors.

    (…)

    The U.S. defense industry has morphed from about 60 big companies at the start of the 1980s to only five prime contractors today. Pentagon leaders have indicated they wouldn’t allow further mergers between the main players— Lockheed Martin Corp. , Boeing, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and Raytheon.

  • « Newer Entries
  • | Older Entries »
  • Eddy ElfenbeinEddy Elfenbein is a Washington, DC-based speaker, portfolio manager and editor of the blog Crossing Wall Street. His Buy List has beaten the S&P 500 over the last 20 years. (more)

  • Archives

    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005

This material is provided for informational purposes only, as of the date hereof, and is subject to change without notice.
This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities.
Disclaimer | © Copyright 2026 Crossing Wall Street.