Crossing Wall Street
  • Home
  • About
  • Buy List
  • ETF
  • Top Posts
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

  • Morning News: January 17, 2018
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 17th, 2018 at 7:05 am

    Beware the $500 Billion Bond Exodus

    What Could Kill the Bitcoin Boom

    Did Bitcoin Just Burst? How It Compares to History’s Big Bubbles

    World’s Largest Money Manager to CEOs: You Must Do Good for Society

    At Retail Trade Show, Technology is the Star

    Nutella Maker to Pay $2.8 Billion for Nestle U.S. Candy Unit

    IBM Forges Global Joint Venture With Maersk Applying Blockchain To ‘Digitize’ Global Trade

    Why Breaking Up General Electric May Be Hard to Do

    Nissan Is Turning Infiniti into an Electric Luxury Brand

    Ferrari Is Planning to Bring an Electric Supercar to Market

    Why New Tax Law Cost Citigroup, GM $29 Billion

    Bank of America Profit Slumps on $2.9 Billion Tax Charge

    Joshua Brown: What If the Price of Bitcoin Is the Least Interesting Thing About It?

    Jeff Carter: Should Google, Facebook and Other Large Tech Firms be Broken Up?

    Michael Batnick: Animal Spirits: Nobody Wants to Listen to Your Podcast

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • Big Reversal Today
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 16th, 2018 at 5:07 pm

    The stock market had a big reversal today. I can’t remember the last one this big (and I’m too lazy to look it up.)

    At one point this morning, the S&P 500 was up 0.76% to a new all-time high. We couldn’t hold on, and the index closed down 0.35%.

    Crypto-Land had a very tough day. Bitcoin fell over $3,000 for a loss of 22%.

  • The S&P 500 Gets Modern
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 16th, 2018 at 1:47 pm

    S&P is making some important classification changes to the S&P 500, and I think it’s long overdue. I’ve never liked the Telecom sector as a stand-alone sector. The good news is that Telecom is being renamed Communication Services. They’re going to take the old Telecom stocks and add a bunch of “new media” stocks like Facebook, Alphabet, Comcast and Netflix.

    I don’t know exactly how I’d classify a company like Facebook, but I suppose Communications is pretty good.

    They’re also updating the Internet & Direct Marketing Retail Sub-Industry to include all “online marketplaces.” This will include companies like Alibaba and eBay.

    This is going to blow a big hole in the Tech Sector (formally, the Information Technology). S&P is also going to take companies in the Internet Software & Services Sub-Industry and put then in a new Internet Services & Infrastructure Sub-Industry which will be under the IT Services Industry.

    They’re going to take some companies currently labeled as Internet Software & Services and reclassify them as Application Software. This will ditch the current Internet Software & Services Industry and Sub-Industry. Good.

    The new structure will have 11 Sectors, 24 Industry Groups, 69 Industries and 158 Sub-Industries.

  • Morning News: January 16, 2018
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 16th, 2018 at 7:05 am

    Bitcoin Tanks Below $12,000 as Regulators Plan New Cryptocurrency Rules

    Oil Trades Near Three-Year High as Hedge Funds Increase Bullish Bets

    Saudi Aramco Snubs UBS and Bank of America for Listing Roles

    Inflation Falls Back For First Time Since June as Brexit Hit Wanes

    This Year Looks Different for U.S. Inflation as Wall St. Braces

    The Senate’s Push to Overrule the FCC on Net Neutrality Now Has 50 Votes, Democrats Say

    Investors Can’t Get Enough of the Metal Used to Cut Vehicle Pollution

    U.S. Lawmakers Urge AT&T to Cut Commercial Ties with Huawei

    BP to Book $1.7 Billion Charge for Deepwater Horizon Claims

    Chinese Carmaker May Use Fiat Chrysler for Foothold in United States

    Black Rock’s Message: Contribute to Society, Or Risk Losing Our Support

    Raine Takes a Stake in `Planet of the Apps’ Creator

    Roger Nusbaum: Maven Recap

    Cullen Roche: Will Centralized Entities Ruin the Decentralized Party?

    Howard Lindzon: Group Frenzy and Hilariously Rich

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • MLK’s “Street Sweeper” Speech
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 15th, 2018 at 10:19 am

    Dr. King was born 89 years ago today.

    Ecclesiastes 9:10

    Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy might; for there is no work, nor device, nor knowledge, nor wisdom, in the grave, whither thou goest.

  • Morning News: January 15, 2018
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 15th, 2018 at 7:07 am

    Pressure Rising on OPEC to Develop Long-Term Output Plan

    These Digital Coins Soar (or Fall) With Bitcoin

    China Escalates Crackdown on Cryptocurrency Trading

    Hedge Funds Are Making Money From Exotic Bets

    Carillion Collapses After U.K. Government Refuses Bailout

    Detroit Auto Show May Be Celebrating An Era About to End

    Ford Will Invest $11 Billion by 2022 To Launch 40 New Electric Cars and Hybrids Worldwide

    Alibaba’s AI Outguns Humans in Reading Test

    Big Bets on A.I. Open Up a New Frontier for Chip Start-Ups, Too

    SoftBank Flirts With Wireless Unit IPO that Could Be Japan’s Biggest in Two Decades

    Unlocking the Airbus A380 Success

    Lego Plans Video Games, Social Network for Chinese Children

    Jeff Miller: A Confusing Earnings Season

    Jeff Carter: There Is One Bear Market

    Ben Carlson: Updating My Favorite Performance Chart for 2017

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • The Forgotten Bull Market 1949-1955
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 14th, 2018 at 12:03 pm

    Probably the least well-known bull market for the U.S. stock market is the amazing run stocks had from June 13, 1949 to September 23, 1955. The Dow more than tripled in a little over seven years, rising from 161.60 to 487.45.

    What’s even more impressive is that this bull market began during the late stages of one recession and continued right through another.

    fredgraph02062013

    I’m calling this one bull market which you can easily divide into two major runs. The first part, from June 13, 1949 to September 13, 1951 (exactly 27 months), is when the Dow raced from 161.60 to 276.37. That’s a 71% gain.

    Two years and one day later, on September 14, 1953, the Dow stood at 255.49. From there, it raced 90.8% toward its peak on September 23, 1955. That run lasted two years and nine days.

    The stock market was eventually spooked by President Eisenhower’s heart attack. On Monday, September 26, 1955, the Dow dropped 6.54%. That was the worst day for the market since the fall of France 15 years before.

    This was a golden age for the economy. Energy was cheap. The country was having a baby boom. The rich and the poor were moving closer together. Over the 75-month period from June 1949 to September 1955, the CPI rose by 12.25% which is just 1.86% annualized.

    Although I’m calling September 1955 the end of the bull market, the Dow continued to charge higher but at a reduced rate. The Dow reached a peak of 421.05 on April 6, 1956. That’s a 6.9% gain in a little over six months from the peak I’m using. The Dow wouldn’t set another new high for almost two-and-a-half years.

    But here’s the important question: why isn’t this bull market better known? My guess is because it never came to a crashing end. There’s no way anyone can moralize about greedy bubbles when it never popped. The 1950s stock market continued to climb for several more years. We really didn’t experience a major crisis until the 1970s.

    fredgraph02062013a

    This is one case in which stocks really did reach a permanently high plateau, and it really was different this time.

  • The Duck Quacks Back
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 12th, 2018 at 3:36 pm

    Here’s the press release:

    Statement from Aflac Incorporated regarding recent false allegations

    COLUMBUS, Ga., Jan. 12, 2018 /PRNewswire/ — Recent media stories regarding Aflac contain false allegations made by a very small group of independent contractors. Aflac intends to aggressively fight these allegations beginning with filing for their dismissal. The unfounded articles allege claims including insider trading, fraudulent sales and financial manipulation. The Company has investigated these claims and found them to be without merit.

    Mr. Conroy and the individuals involved with these unfounded claims are not employees of Aflac and as such can be part-time and licensed to sell with other companies as well. Mr. Conroy has formerly served as an Aflac district sales coordinator and has realized financial benefits through his association with Aflac. It should also be noted that these allegations are coming from fewer than 10 individuals among up to 70,000 independent contractors and brokers licensed to sell Aflac products. The insider trading, fraudulent sales and financial manipulation claims alleged by the individuals have been investigated by the Company and an independent special committee of the Company’s board of directors.

    Aflac has a long history of operating with transparency and integrity, having been named by Fortune Magazine as one of the Best Companies to Work For for 19 consecutive years and a World’s Most Ethical Company by Ethisphere for 11 consecutive years.

    From The Fly:

    Aflac selloff on Intercept article an overreaction, says Evercore ISI

    The Intercept’s article today on Aflac is “filled with hyperbole, which reduces the credibility of the claims being brought,” Evercore ISI analyst Thomas Gallagher tells investors in a research note. The analyst admits, however, that it is unclear to know whether the fraud allegations by former employees have any merit. Gallagher views the 8% selloff today in shares of Aflac as an overreaction. The stock is now pricing in a “reasonably high probability that there are systemic issues here,” the analyst contends. He has an In Line rating on Aflac with an $87 price target. The stock in afternoon trading is down 8%, or $7.58, to $84.11

    Some tweets:

    This is actually false, unless one bad regional manager did this. I'm a broker offering many carriers, along with Aflac, and they've been one of the best companies to work with–not just for agent compensation, but for client claims.

    — Natasha Harmon (@ShesNatashaJean) January 12, 2018

    I have been an Aflac agent for over 15 years. I have never been forced to purchase any policies. I have never been told it was an employee benefit. Disability is not even a product that agents look at purchasing in the first place due to our 1099 status.

    — Brian Demarest (@brian_demarest) January 12, 2018

  • Inflation and Retail Sales
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 12th, 2018 at 3:31 pm

    This morning, the government released the CPI data for December. Last month, consumer prices rose by 0.1%. Actually, working out the decimals, the CPI was up 0.1498. In the last year, inflation was up 2.12%.

    The core rate rose by 0.3%. That’s the biggest monthly increase since January 2017. For the year, core prices were up 1.77%.

    Here’s an updated look at the real Fed funds rate based off core inflation:

    The government also said that retail sales rose by 0.4% in December. They also raised the number for November up to 0.9%. Retail sales were up 5.4% from last December.

  • Fraud Allegations at AFLAC
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on January 12th, 2018 at 10:09 am

    Shares of AFLAC (AFL) are down sharply today after The Intercept ran an article detailing troubling practices by the company.

    The insurance firm AFLAC Aflac has exploited workers, manipulated its accounting, and deceived shareholders and customers, according to nine former employees. This article is based on interviews with multiple current and former employees, as well as three previously unreported lawsuits.

    The allegations contained in the lawsuits involve nearly every aspect of Aflac’s business and have already led to a series of investigations by state and federal regulators. But though Aflac’s top management and board of directors have known about the claims for over a year, they have not disclosed anything to shareholders in public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission beyond generalities about unnamed pending lawsuits that they say they expect will not hurt the company’s bottom line.

    I want to be careful how I word my response. The allegations, if true, are disappointing. However, nothing I’ve seen so far has me concerned for AFLAC’s future.

    First, let me say that I’m hardly an independent observer. I’ve owned AFLAC’s stock for many years, and I’ve admired the company.

    Also, The Intercept has a political bent to their reporting. I’m reading this with my eyes open.

    But most of what I’ve read so far is what I’d call the unseemly byproduct of running a large and profitable enterprise.

    For example, the sales jobs described and very tough and demanding. That’s not a surprise. Perhaps AFLAC makes the jobs seem better than they are, but that’s a long way from an Enron-type scam. It’s not difficult for them to revamp their recruitment process.

    Any big company will have lawsuits brought against them. If you read what the lawyers have to say, without any explanation from the company, the picture can look quite ugly. That’s what lawyers do.

    In the movie Raising Arizona, the police asked Nathan Arizona, Sr., if he had any disgruntled employees. He answered, “Hell, they’re all disgruntled. I ain’t running no damn daisy farm.”

    Some of The Intercept’s language is stretched. For example:

    Sharecroppers after the Civil War were famously charged endless fees and rent for farming equipment and use of the land, an arrangement that feels reminiscent for Aflac’s white-collar version.

    Comparing selling supplemental life insurance to sharecropping? That’s just absurd.

    Most of what’s alleged can be explained by saying that AFLAC plays to win in a tough business. The company has 10,000 full-time employees and they do more than $20 billion in annual revenue. If you talk to all the former employees, the most disaffected can surely share some ugly stories.

    But AFLAC could not have grown so large by stomping on so many people. The reality is that sales jobs are not for everyone.

    The Intercept says this is the first of a series. So far, I’m not exactly overwhelmed by the allegations. What’s important to me is seeing evidence of fraud or illegal behavior. I also want to see AFLAC get in front of this story.

  • « Newer Entries
  • | Older Entries »
  • Eddy ElfenbeinEddy Elfenbein is a Washington, DC-based speaker, portfolio manager and editor of the blog Crossing Wall Street. His Buy List has beaten the S&P 500 over the last 20 years. (more)

  • Archives

    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005

This material is provided for informational purposes only, as of the date hereof, and is subject to change without notice.
This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities.
Disclaimer | © Copyright 2026 Crossing Wall Street.