• Morning News: February 28, 2017
    Posted by on February 28th, 2017 at 6:03 am

    Bill Gates Says It’s Too Early For Basic Income, But Over Time ‘Countries Will Be Rich Enough’

    Warren Buffett Thinks Only These Two Newspapers Are Certain to Survive

    Big Business Giants From Microsoft to J.P. Morgan Are Getting Behind Ethereum

    Snap IPO: Why It May Be The Next Facebook

    How Walmart Is Improving Its Pharmacy Service

    Fidelity Slashes Commissions in the Latest Salvo in the Fee Wars

    Priceline Revenue Up 17.4% on Higher Hotel Bookings

    Starbucks to Make Italian Debut With Upscale Roastery Cafe

    JPMorgan Software Does in Seconds What Took Lawyers 360,000 Hours

    Takata Pleads Guilty In Air Bag Scheme, Will Pay $1 Billion In Penalties

    Samsung Group Dismantles Nerve Centre as Chief Faces Bribery Charge Amid Scandal

    Uber Executive, Linked to an Old Harassment Claim, Resigns

    Oscars Mistake Casts Unwanted Spotlight on PwC

    Howard Lindzon: The Pusher of Omaha

    Cullen Roche: The Biggest Myths in Investing, Part 6 – Gold is a Good Portfolio Hedge

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • The Financial Crisis 10 Years On
    Posted by on February 27th, 2017 at 1:29 pm

    You can quibble with an exact starting point for the Financial Crisis, but I’d go with February 27, 2007 — ten years ago today.

    The thing about the Financial Crisis is that it didn’t suddenly begin as one turned on the lights. Rather, several events came together that got worse and worse until…boom!

    Stocks tumbled across the board Tuesday, after declining markets in China and Europe and a steep drop in durable goods orders triggered a massive selloff on Wall Street.

    The Dow Jones industrial average (down 416.02 to 12,216.24) tumbled 416.02 points, its biggest one-day point loss since the day the stock market reopened after the Sept. 11th attacks. On that day, the Dow lost 684.81 points.

    On a percentage basis, the Dow lost about 3.3 percent. The blue-chip barometer has now fallen for five sessions straight.

    The broader S&P 500 (down 50.33 to 1,399.04) index fell 3.5 percent and saw its biggest one-day percentage loss in nearly four years. The S&P 500 also slumped for the previous four sessions.

    The Nasdaq (down 96.66 to 2,407.86, Charts) composite tumbled about 3.9 percent and saw its biggest one-day percentage loss since Dec. 9, 2002, according to early tallies.

    The Russell 2000 (down 31.03 to 792.66) small-cap index lost almost 4 percent.

    Trying to limit the declines, the New York Stock Exchange said it imposed trading curbs as of 1:03 p.m. ET, around the time the Dow slipped 200 points, CNN confirmed.

    Treasury bonds rallied as investors sought a safe place to park their money while the dollar fell. Oil prices inched higher and gold prices fell.

    On the final day of trading in 2012, the S&P 500 was still below its close from February 26, 2007.

  • Barron’s Highlights Axalta
    Posted by on February 27th, 2017 at 10:23 am

    In this weekend’s Barron’s, David Englander highlights the smallest stock on our Buy List, Axalta Coating Systems (AXTA). He lays out the case for a 20% rally from here:

    Axalta has a high-quality franchise, with No. 1 or No. 2 positions in various automotive-coating sectors. Notably, it’s the leader in refinishing, a less cyclical business than selling coatings for vehicles that are being assembled. Sales depend on collisions and miles driven, not on production rates.

    Refinishing, which accounts for about 40% of revenue, is expected to grow in the next year, a beneficiary of the more than 1.2 billion vehicles on the road, globally. Axalta draws another 40% of its revenue from coatings for new vehicles.

    On the basis of enterprise value to estimated Ebitda (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), Axalta trades at a 10 times multiple, which looks inexpensive compared with coating peers. PPG Industries (PPG), for example, fetches 11 times.

    One bull on the stock, analyst Mike Sisson at KeyBanc Capital Markets, thinks a 12 multiple is reasonable. He values Axalta shares at $35. Using the same multiple on 2018 estimates, the stock could be worth more than $38.

  • The Treasury Is Considering 50-Year Bonds
    Posted by on February 27th, 2017 at 9:14 am

    Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently said that the Treasury is considering floating 50-year Treasury bonds. I think this would be a good idea.

    Generally speaking, the larger your debt is, the longer you want to roll it out. Now that Uncle Sam’s debt is at $20 trillion, we should think about longer durations. Also, interest rates are still historically low. This would be a good opportunity to lock in low yields.

    Having a liquid market is valuable, but the market is telling other bond issuers that it wants lots more long-term debt. The Treasury should sell more 30-year bonds, and even 50-year or 100-year bonds to meet that demand.

    Ireland, Belgium and Mexico have recently sold 100-year bonds. Ford, Disney and Coca-Cola have sold 100-year bonds as well. The Canadian Pacific Corp. sold a 1,000-year bond.

    And many governments, such as the U.K., have issued bonds that have no maturity date at all: Called perpetuals or consols, these bonds continue paying a coupon year-after-year until the principal is redeemed. The U.K. recently redeemed the consols that had financed its earlier wars against Napoleon and the kaiser.

    Who buys these long bonds? Mostly pension funds and insurance companies that want to match the maturities of their assets and their liabilities. The U.S. government should also think about issuing more long-term bonds to match the timing of future Social Security and Medicare payments.

    Kudos to Mnuchin and Trump for thinking of the taxpayer first.

    From a data perspective, I’d be curious to see if there’s any significant difference in the yield of a 30-year and 50-year bond.

  • The Dow Makes It 11 in a Row
    Posted by on February 27th, 2017 at 9:01 am

    Late in the day on Friday, the Dow staged a great comeback to close higher for the 11th day in a row.

  • Morning News: February 27, 2017
    Posted by on February 27th, 2017 at 7:22 am

    Man Who Moved Oil With His Words Won’t Talk About It Anymore

    LSE-Deutsche Boerse Deal In Danger

    Fed Turns to Job Hoppers as 1950s Inflation Guide Shows Its Age

    FBI Lawyer Sting Rattles Billion-Dollar Whistle-Blower Unit

    To Keep U.S. Jobs, Chip Makers Share a Factory and Pin Hopes on Trump

    Buffett Asks Big Money: Why Pay High Fees?

    The Complete Bearish Case Against Investing in Snapchat’s Massive IPO

    Minimum Wage Hikes And Online Sales Will Save Wal-Mart, But Not Neighborhood Stores

    SoftBank Is Homing in on a $3 Billion Investment in WeWork

    Smartvue Delivers IoT Video Services for Hewlett Packard Enterprise

    Popularity of Sony’s PlayStation VR Surprises Even the Company

    Amazon, Netflix Grab a Share of Oscar Glory

    Takata’s Guilty Plea to Be Considered Monday by U.S. Judge

    Jeff Miller: Have Stock Prices Lost Touch with Reality?

    Josh Brown: Proudly Permabullish

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • The Berkshire Letter
    Posted by on February 25th, 2017 at 10:46 pm

    Here’s Warren Buffett’s latest letter to shareholders. Even for those of you who don’t own any shares of Berkshire Hathaway, the annual letter makes for good reading.

    I though this section on share repurchases was interesting.

    Share Repurchases

    In the investment world, discussions about share repurchases often become heated. But I’d suggest that participants in this debate take a deep breath: Assessing the desirability of repurchases isn’t that complicated.

    From the standpoint of exiting shareholders, repurchases are always a plus. Though the day-to-day impact of these purchases is usually minuscule, it’s always better for a seller to have an additional buyer in the market.

    For continuing shareholders, however, repurchases only make sense if the shares are bought at a price below intrinsic value. When that rule is followed, the remaining shares experience an immediate gain in intrinsic value. Consider a simple analogy: If there are three equal partners in a business worth $3,000 and one is bought out by the partnership for $900, each of the remaining partners realizes an immediate gain of $50. If the exiting partner is paid $1,100, however, the continuing partners each suffer a loss of $50. The same math applies with corporations and their shareholders. Ergo, the question of whether a repurchase action is value-enhancing or value-destroying for continuing shareholders is entirely purchase-price dependent.

    It is puzzling, therefore, that corporate repurchase announcements almost never refer to a price above which repurchases will be eschewed. That certainly wouldn’t be the case if a management was buying an outside business. There, price would always factor into a buy-or-pass decision.

    When CEOs or boards are buying a small part of their own company, though, they all too often seem oblivious to price. Would they behave similarly if they were managing a private company with just a few owners and were evaluating the wisdom of buying out one of them? Of course not.

    It is important to remember that there are two occasions in which repurchases should not take place, even if the company’s shares are underpriced. One is when a business both needs all its available money to protect or expand its own operations and is also uncomfortable adding further debt. Here, the internal need for funds should take priority. This exception assumes, of course, that the business has a decent future awaiting it after the needed expenditures are made.

    The second exception, less common, materializes when a business acquisition (or some other investment opportunity) offers far greater value than do the undervalued shares of the potential repurchaser. Long ago, Berkshire itself often had to choose between these alternatives. At our present size, the issue is far less likely to arise.

    My suggestion: Before even discussing repurchases, a CEO and his or her Board should stand, join hands and in unison declare, ‘What is smart at one price is stupid at another.’

  • Buy These Two S&P Losers?
    Posted by on February 24th, 2017 at 9:25 am

  • CWS Market Review – February 24, 2017
    Posted by on February 24th, 2017 at 7:08 am

    “90% of the people in the stock market, professionals and amateurs alike,
    simply haven’t done enough homework.” – William J. O’Neil

    You can’t keep a good market down! The Dow has now risen for 10 days in a row, which is the longest winning streak in 30 years. Not only that, but the bull continues to be unusually calm. The S&P 500 has now gone 91 days in a row without a 1% down day.

    Can the market sustain this pace? The answer is no, but it’s a tough game predicting exactly when the bull needs to take a rest. Our strategy continues to be: focus on high-quality stocks, and don’t get scared out of them. I’m pleased to see that our Buy List is already up 6% for the year. Thanks to a strong earnings report, Moody’s just became our first 20% winner on the year.

    In this week’s CWS Market Review, I’ll go over our recent earnings reports. We had some good ones like Moody’s, but also some disappointing ones like Hormel and Wabtec. I’ll go over them all in a just a bit. I’ll also bring you up to speed on the latest economic news. There’s a decent chance the Federal Reserve will raise rates again sometime soon. We also got dividend increases from Danaher and Cinemark. But first, let’s spend a few seconds on this week’s Fed minutes.

    The Federal Reserve May Strike Soon

    The Federal Reserve had a two-day meeting on January 31 and February 1. At the time, I told you not to expect them to make any moves on interest rates. I was right, and the Fed left rates unchanged.

    This week, however, the Fed released the minutes from that meeting, and they indicated that some members want to see rates go up soon. This is important because higher rates can kill any rally, even one as durable as the current bull.

    Like many things economic, the minutes aren’t very clearly written. All we know is that “many” members want to see rates go up “fairly soon.” How many is “many” and how soon is “fairly”? I’m afraid that’s left shrouded in the mystery that only economists can penetrate.

    Those of us who live in the real world can make some reasonable guesses and assume it comes down to the Fed’s next two meetings. The central bankers get together again on March 14-15, and then again on May 2-3. The futures market now thinks there’s a 38% chance of a rate hike in March, and a 63% chance of a hike in May. That latter figure is up from 49% at the start of this month.

    The Fed always says they want to be flexible and focused on the data. While the Fed raised rates in December, the latest inflation data suggests that the rise in consumer prices completely negated the rate increase. So it may be time for another. Plus, there are now clear signs that the economy is getting better. This week, we learned that existing home sales rose to a 10-year high. Also, the four-week moving average on initial jobless claims dropped to a 43-year low.

    What does this mean for investors? I continue to believe that investors should be defensive over the next several weeks. I don’t expect the market to crash, but Wall Street’s calmness won’t last forever. Interestingly, the S&P 500 Tech Sector Index just snapped a 15-day winning streak. Like other record streaks, it had never happened before. Then it ended.

    Now let’s look at our recent Buy List earnings reports.

    Six Buy List Earnings Reports

    We had two earnings reports last Friday. First up, JM Smucker (SJM) reported fiscal Q3 earnings of $2 per share. That’s down from $2.05 per share a year ago, but it matched Wall Street’s forecast on the nose. Quarterly sales fell 5%.

    Smucker said they’ve been working hard to control costs, so the sales shortfall didn’t hurt the bottom line. The bad news is that Smucker lowered the high end of their full-year EPS forecast by a nickel per share. The company now sees 2017 earnings ranging between $7.60 and $7.70 per share. This is for the fiscal year that ends in April.

    Here’s what’s interesting. The stock dropped at Friday’s open to about $130 per share from $138 at last Thursday’s close. SJM then rallied during the day on Friday to $136 by the closing bell. The shares then gapped up to $143 on Monday, probably due to Kraft Heinz backing out of its mega-merger deal with Unilever. That has to put Smucker in play. I’m raising my Buy Below on Smucker to $146 per share.

    Also on Friday, Moody’s (MCO) said that it earned $1.23 per share for Q4. That was nine cents better than expectations. Quarterly revenues rose 8.8% to $942.1 million, which also beat expectations. The earnings, I should add, are adjusted for a big check the company had to send the Justice Department to settle its legal problems. I’m glad that’s now behind them.

    For 2017, Moody’s said they expect earnings between $5 and $5.15 per share, which doesn’t include a 15-cent per share accounting benefit. Wall Street had been expecting $5.07 per share. That’s pretty good growth. For 2016, Moody’s made $4.81 per share.

    The stock is already a 20% winner for us this year. This week, I’m lifting my Buy Below on Moody’s to $119 per share.

    Big Earnings Miss from Wabtec

    Wabtec (WAB) gave us disappointing news on Tuesday. The rail-service company said they made 81 cents per share for Q4, which was 13 cents below estimates. This is their second soggy earnings report in a row.

    Even the CEO said the earnings were “disappointing.” The problem is that the freight-rail sector continues to be soft. Also, it’s been more difficult for WAB to close the deal for Faiveley Transport than they expected. For the year, WAB earned $3.34 per share, which was below the company’s forecast of $3.45 to $3.50 per share.

    Earnings, likewise, missed the mark, coming in at $3.34 per share, which was below its guidance of $3.45 to $3.50 per share. Despite the rough year in 2016, Wabtec sees things getting better this year. They expect full-year earnings to range between $3.95 and $4.15 per share.

    The shares have now shed 11% since Monday’s close. I’m lowering my Buy Below on Wabtec to $84 per share.

    Three More Earnings Reports on Thursday

    On Thursday, we had three more earnings reports. Hormel Foods (HRL) posted fiscal Q1 earnings of 44 cents per share, which was one penny shy of estimates. The Spam stock also lowered its full-year guidance to $1.65 to $1.71 per share. That’s a decrease of three cents to both ends of the range. Hormel cited “challenging market conditions in the turkey industry.”

    For Q1, Jennie-O Turkey sales rose 13%, but segment profits fell 25%. Overall sales fell 0.5% to $2.28 billion. Despite the earnings miss, this was Hormel’s 15th record quarter in a row.

    “We are tempering our full-year outlook for the Jennie-O Turkey Store segment given the shortfalls in the first quarter and the expected continuation of pricing pressure due to low commodity turkey prices. Improvements in our other segments are expected to offset some of the earnings headwinds from Jennie-O Turkey Store,” Snee said.

    Shares of Hormel lost 5.4% on Thursday. These results are disappointing, but I’m not too concerned about a minor drop in outlook from a company like Hormel. They’ll be fine. Hormel is a buy up to $37 per share.

    Also on Thursday, Cinemark (CNK) reported Q4 earnings of 66 cents per share, which demolished Wall Street’s estimates of 44 cents per share. Quarterly revenues slipped a bit to $700.9 million.

    “It was a banner year for the North American industry box office, achieving its 4th all-time high in the past 5 years,” stated Mark Zoradi, Cinemark’s Chief Executive Officer. “Cinemark’s domestic operations outperformed the North American industry box office by 100 basis points, and globally we set numerous records, including total revenues of nearly $3 billion, net income of $255 million and Adjusted EBITDA of more than $706 million. Furthermore, our ability to increase our dividend, while continuing to actively invest in growth initiatives, is indicative of the consistent strength of our balance sheet, as well as our confidence in Cinemark.”

    For the year, CNK’s revenues increased 2.3% to $2.92 billion. Earnings per share came in at $2.19 compared to $1.87 for 2015. They also have ambitious plans for this future: CNK wants to open eight new theaters this year.

    Cinemark also raised its quarterly dividend from 27 to 29 cents per share. The new dividend will be paid on March 20 to stockholders of record on March 8. I’m raising my Buy Below on Cinemark to $46 per share.

    Our final earnings report for this season came from Continental Building Products (CBPX). The company earned 31 cents per share last quarter, which was four cents more than Wall Street had been expecting. Quarterly revenue rose 7.1% to $118.2 million, which also topped estimates.

    Looking through the numbers, Continental had a solid year in 2016. Of course, what matters to us is 2017 and beyond. The company provided guidance on several performance metrics, but not on EPS. The company earned $1.08 per share last year. I think the company can earn as much as $1.35 per share this year. The stock could turn out to be one of our big winners this year.

    Two Buy List Reports Next Week

    Just two more Buy List earnings reports next week, but these are for companies with quarters that ended in January. After them, I promise we won’t have much in the way of earnings news for several weeks.

    Ross Stores (ROST) is due to report fiscal Q4 earnings on Tuesday, February 28. This will be for the key holiday-shopping season. In November, Ross had a very good earnings report for Q3. However, they offered somewhat tepid guidance for Q4. I know Ross likes to set expectations low. That always makes the earnings “beats” look that much more impressive.

    For Q4, Ross sees comparable-store sales growth of just 1% to 2%, and earnings per share ranging between 72 and 75 cents per share. Since Ross has already made $2.06 per share for the first three quarters, that works out to full-year earnings of $2.78 to $2.81 per share. That would be an increase of 11% to 12% over last year’s profit of $2.51 per share.

    Also on Tuesday, HEICO (HEI) is due to report. The company had a great year in 2016, and it was our top-performing stock. For 2017, HEICO sees net sales growth of 5% to 7% and net income growth of 7% to 10%. That works out to an EPS range of $2.45 to $2.52. Wall Street expects quarterly earnings of 54 cents per share.

    Before I go, I wanted to mention that Danaher (DHR) raised its quarterly dividend from 12.5 cents to 14 cents per share. The new dividend is payable on April 28 to holders of record on March 31. DHR is a buy up to $87 per share.

    That’s all for now. Next week will be a busy one for economic reports. The durable-goods report comes out on Monday. On Tuesday, the government will revise its report on Q4 GDP. Then on Wednesday, we’ll get reports on consumer income and spending, plus the ISM Index. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!

    – Eddy

  • Morning News: February 24, 2017
    Posted by on February 24th, 2017 at 6:58 am

    Oil Prices Fall as U.S. Crude Inventories Rise Further

    China Overtakes U.S., France as Germany’s Biggest Trading Partner

    China Says No Intention Of Using Currency Devaluation To Its Advantage

    Even China Can’t Kill Bitcoin

    RBS Cuts CEO’s Potential Share Award 40% After Ninth Annual Loss

    Mnuchin Tells Carney to Expect America-First Push on Regulation

    Jury Rejects U.S. Seizure of Luxury Cars From Exporters

    Fewer Niceties, Similar Price: Airlines Turn to ‘Basic Economy’ Fares

    HPE’s Whitman Struggles in Shift to Smaller Size, Cloud Pressure

    Is Snapchat’s IPO the Good Kind of Crazy?

    Google Self-Driving Car Unit Accuses Uber of Using Stolen Technology

    Mercedes-Benz Mulls North American Potential For Pick-Up Trucks

    Here’s Where Travis Kalanick Really Went Wrong With Uber’s Harassment Claims

    Roger Nusbaum: Don’t Make The Same Mistake As Norway

    Jeff Miller: Stock Exchange: How To Play Sector Rotation

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.