Crossing Wall Street
  • Home
  • About
  • Buy List
  • ETF
  • Top Posts
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

  • July Rate Hike off the Table?
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 15th, 2016 at 5:34 pm

  • Today’s Fed Statement
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 15th, 2016 at 2:01 pm

    No change in rates:

    Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April indicates that the pace of improvement in the labor market has slowed while growth in economic activity appears to have picked up. Although the unemployment rate has declined, job gains have diminished. Growth in household spending has strengthened. Since the beginning of the year, the housing sector has continued to improve and the drag from net exports appears to have lessened, but business fixed investment has been soft. Inflation has continued to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, partly reflecting earlier declines in energy prices and in prices of non-energy imports. Market-based measures of inflation compensation declined; most survey-based measures of longer-term inflation expectations are little changed, on balance, in recent months.

    Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee currently expects that, with gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, economic activity will expand at a moderate pace and labor market indicators will strengthen. Inflation is expected to remain low in the near term, in part because of earlier declines in energy prices, but to rise to 2 percent over the medium term as the transitory effects of past declines in energy and import prices dissipate and the labor market strengthens further. The Committee continues to closely monitor inflation indicators and global economic and financial developments.

    Against this backdrop, the Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1/4 to 1/2 percent. The stance of monetary policy remains accommodative, thereby supporting further improvement in labor market conditions and a return to 2 percent inflation.

    In determining the timing and size of future adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will assess realized and expected economic conditions relative to its objectives of maximum employment and 2 percent inflation. This assessment will take into account a wide range of information, including measures of labor market conditions, indicators of inflation pressures and inflation expectations, and readings on financial and international developments. In light of the current shortfall of inflation from 2 percent, the Committee will carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward its inflation goal. The Committee expects that economic conditions will evolve in a manner that will warrant only gradual increases in the federal funds rate; the federal funds rate is likely to remain, for some time, below levels that are expected to prevail in the longer run. However, the actual path of the federal funds rate will depend on the economic outlook as informed by incoming data.

    The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities and of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction, and it anticipates doing so until normalization of the level of the federal funds rate is well under way. This policy, by keeping the Committee’s holdings of longer-term securities at sizable levels, should help maintain accommodative financial conditions.

    Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Janet L. Yellen, Chair; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; Lael Brainard; James Bullard; Stanley Fischer; Esther L. George; Loretta J. Mester; Jerome H. Powell; Eric Rosengren; and Daniel K. Tarullo.

    Here are the current projections.

  • Morning News: June 15, 2016
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 15th, 2016 at 7:30 am

    Stock Selloff Deepens as Investors Seek Safety

    Fed Faces Battle to Escape World’s Low Interest Rate Grip

    China’s Bank Lending Rebounds; Good for Growth, Bad for Risk

    Iran Said to Have Deal With Boeing to Buy Passenger Planes

    India’s Government Approves New Civil Aviation Policy

    Fund Managers Are Stockpiling Cash

    Retail Sales Rise More Than Forecast as U.S. Consumers Spend

    The 60/40 Portfolio Is Dead… And It’s Not Coming Back

    MSCI Slaps China in the Face With Index Decision

    Why Billions in Proven Shale Oil Reserves Suddenly Became Unproven

    Microsoft – Wide Awake In Seattle

    JP Morgan Says Brexit Lead For Leave Bigger After Removing Hoax Poll

    The Deepest Money Pit Atlantic City Has Ever Seen Re-Opens This Week

    Howard Lindzon: Nobody and No Entity is Bigger than The Markets…2016 Edition

    Jeff Carter: Getting to No

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • Join Me on Thursday
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 14th, 2016 at 9:32 am

    Join me this Thursday at 4 p.m. Eastern Time. I’ll be the guest on AdvisorShares’ weekly live “Alpha Call.” You can join the call and ask me a question.

    Here are the call-in details:

    Dial 1.310.372.7549 (or 1.800.356.8278) and enter access code 176071.

  • Morning News: June 14, 2016
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 14th, 2016 at 7:18 am

    Central Banks And Markets On Accommodative Juice – Commodities To Rally

    Brexit’s First 100 Days Promise Chaos, Fear, Damage Limitation

    IEA Sees Oil Market Balance in 2016, Surplus to Re-Emerge Next Year

    Microsoft Buys LinkedIn for $26.2 BIllion

    Why Big Profits On Gun Stocks May Be In the Past

    McDonald’s Return to Chicago Defies City’s Financial Troubles

    New Valeant CEO Meets Investors as Doubts Grow About Drug Company

    Alibaba’s Jack Ma: Better-Than-Ever Fakes Worsen Piracy War

    NXP Semiconductors to Sell Standard Products Unit for $2.75 Billion

    EU Set to Clear Unconditionally Marriott, Starwood Deal

    Quicken Founder and Warren Buffett Have Ties Beyond Yahoo Deal

    Josh Brown: Brexit “Remain” Vote as Market Catalyst

    Roger Nusbaum: Rate Hike This Week Off The Table (Probably…)

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • John Oliver on Retirement Plans
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2016 at 6:02 pm

  • Microsoft to Buy LinkedIn
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2016 at 11:19 am

    Microsoft (MSFT) is shelling out $26.2 billion to buy LinkedIn. The deal is all cash, and Microsoft is paying $196 per shares for LNKD. That’s a 50% premium from Friday’s close, but it’s well below LNKD’s high of $276.18 from February 2015.

    Microsoft said LinkedIn will “retain its distinct brand, culture and independence,” with Chief Executive Jeff Weiner remaining at the helm, reporting to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella. The deal, the largest acquisition ever for Microsoft, is expected to close within the year.

    The companies see cost savings of about $150 million a year by 2018. LinkedIn would be required to pay a $725 million breakup fee if it backs out of the deal.

    Microsoft believes the acquisition will expand the market for both LinkedIn and Microsoft’s Office products. The software giant has made a significant push in the past few years to make its products more connected and wants to use data to make them more intelligent. LinkedIn’s vast network offers data that could help.

    Microsoft may find ways to generate revenue from LinkedIn’s professional network that LinkedIn couldn’t independently, said Stifel Nicolaus & Co. analyst Brad Reback.

    Shares of Microsoft dropped to $49 this morning but have since rallied to about $50.50.

    > Unsubscribe from LinkedIn
    > Delete email account
    > Sell house, live in woods
    >Find bottle in river
    > Has note inside
    > It's from Microsoft

    — Owen Williams ⚡️ (@ow) June 13, 2016

  • The Fed Debates Knut Wicksell
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2016 at 10:37 am

    wicksell-TT

    The Federal Reserve is currently debating the natural interest rate, a concept developed by Knut Wicksell, a Swedish economist who died 90 years ago.

    In today’s Wall Street Journal, Harriet Torry writes:

    While Federal Reserve officials debate when to next raise short-term interest rates, they are also wrestling with the question of how high to lift them in coming years.

    Signs point toward the new normal being much lower than in the past, which has broad implications for when the Fed should tighten monetary policy, how quickly, and how far.

    Fed officials disagree about their likely end point, in part because they are struggling to understand why another underlying interest rate—the mysterious natural rate—has fallen in recent years. And for that many are turning to the musings of Knut Wicksell, a Swedish expert on the subject who died 90 years ago.

    According to the textbooks, this so-called natural rate is the inflation-adjusted rate that’s consistent with the economy operating at its full potential, expanding without overheating. Also known as the equilibrium or neutral rate, it balances savings and investment.

    The natural rate can’t be observed directly; the Fed knows it has been reached only by how the economy responds. “It’s like discovering Pluto: you can only see the effect of the gravitational pull,” said Eddy Elfenbein, an investor and blogger at the site Crossing Wall Street, comparing it to the dwarf planet whose existence was inferred from the orbits of Uranus and Neptune.

    The Fed meets again this week, and they’ll update their forecasts. Within the forecasts, they’ll provide a long run outlook for interest rates which can be implied, to some degree, as to being the Fed’s estimate for the natural rate.

    In March, the Fed saw long-run real rates at 1.25%. That’s below 2% which had been assumed for many years.

    Most economists figured the natural rate was around 2% just before the financial crisis. Today, seven years after the recession, most estimates are around or just below zero.

    “We’re seeing no pickup, none whatsoever, in the natural rate even as the economy has gotten back to full strength,” John Williams, the San Francisco Fed president who has spent years studying it, said in a recent interview with The Wall Street Journal.

    This implies the central bank won’t be moving its benchmark federal-funds rate up much from its current level between 0.25% and 0.50% over the next few years. This, in turn, means lower rates for borrowers and lower returns to savers.

    Policy makers are likely to leave their benchmark rate unchanged Wednesday at the conclusion of their two-day policy meeting, and could consider moving in July or September if the economy improves. They also will release Wednesday new projections for where they think the rate will rest in the long term.

    No one knows where the natural rate is but we know it’s low. Very low.

    “I think the current level of neutral or normal rates is pretty low,” Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen said in Philadelphia last week. She expects it will rise over time, but said “that is something we’re uncertain about and have to find out over time.”

    Economists have offered several theories for why the natural rate has fallen. Former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has cited a glut of savings world-wide. Harvard University economist Lawrence Summers blames ‘secular stagnation,’ or a chronic shortfall in investment demand.

    Ms. Yellen has said temporary headwinds that have restrained growth since the financial crisis may be responsible, such as economic uncertainty, a strong dollar, and slower growth of productivity and the labor force.

    Wicksell has been in vogue lately.

    For guidance Fed officials have been revisiting the work of Mr. Wicksell, a famed Swedish economist who did much of the seminal thinking on the subject more than a hundred years ago. Speeches by senior policy makers, including Ms. Yellen, have referenced Mr. Wicksell five times in the past year alone, and Mr. Bernanke has blogged about the Swede’s ideas about the relationship between interest rates, economic growth and inflation.

    Mr. Wicksell characterized the natural rate of interest as “a certain rate of interest on loans which is neutral in respect to commodity prices, and tends neither to raise nor to lower them.” But the natural rate isn’t observable and depends on “a thousand and one things which determine the current economic position of a community,” and those factors—such as productivity, unemployment, and technological and demographic change—are constantly in flux, he said.

  • Gun Stocks Soar
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2016 at 10:22 am

    Strong opens for Smith & Wesson (SWHC), and Sturm Ruger (RGR):

    big06132016

  • Morning News: June 13, 2016
    Posted by Eddy Elfenbein on June 13th, 2016 at 7:29 am

    Brexit: Britain Leaving the EU Could Be A Messy Divorce

    Will MSCI Hand China a Game Changer?

    China Car-Sales Growth Reaches Five-Month High

    Fed Decision Makers Wrestle With So-Called Natural Rate

    Which Labor Market Data Should You Believe?

    There’s a Seismic Change Coming to Money Markets

    Treasuries in Best Run Since February as Rate Outlook Shifts

    Pew’s Nick Bourke Weighs In on New Payday Loan Regulations

    Symantec Splurges $4.6 Billion On Blue Coat

    DiDi Chuxing Bags $600 Million From China Life

    China Spent $500 Billion to Maintain Confidence in Renminbi

    Gas Is Going Up, But Maybe Not Enough

    Silicon Valley’s Audacious Plan to Create a New Stock Exchange

    Jeff Miller: The Fed, Brexit and the Markets

    Cullen Roche: Three Things I Think I Think – Weekend Edition

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • « Newer Entries
  • | Older Entries »
  • Eddy ElfenbeinEddy Elfenbein is a Washington, DC-based speaker, portfolio manager and editor of the blog Crossing Wall Street. His Buy List has beaten the S&P 500 over the last 20 years. (more)

  • Archives

    • July 2026
    • June 2026
    • May 2026
    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • August 2023
    • July 2023
    • June 2023
    • May 2023
    • April 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • May 2022
    • April 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005

This material is provided for informational purposes only, as of the date hereof, and is subject to change without notice.
This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any securities.
Disclaimer | © Copyright 2026 Crossing Wall Street.