We’re currently in an historic rough patch of the presidential election cycle. From September 6th of the pre-election year until May 28th of the election year, the Dow has lost an average of 5.2%.

Historically, the Dow has gained an average of 24.1% from September 30th of the mid-term election year to September 6th of the pre-election year. This means that nearly two-thirds of the Dow’s four-year gain (24.1% of 36.7%) comes in less than one-quarter of the time. That’s a pretty stunning stat.
After September 6th of the pre-election year till May 29th of the election year, the Dow has historically pulled back 5.2%. After that, it puts on a nice 23.2% climb to August 3rd of the post-election year. Then trouble starts. After August 3rd, the Dow pulls back 5.6% and we’re back at our starting point, September 30th of the mid-term election year.
Yesterday I wrote about the huge divergence between large-caps and small-caps. The Russell 2000 ($RUT) plunged 5.38% while the S&P 500 lost a measly 2.85%. That’s a big spread for one day.
Today, the small-caps are getting their revenge.

Chao Deng in the Columbia Journalism Review:
“The idea that all of a sudden people got the idea that Bernanke was going to do something, to me, is just kind of crazy,” Miller said later when I reached him on the phone. “There is too much meaning inferred from what is normal volatility or variation.”
A better explanation for the Tuesday rally was that the huge stock sell-off in early August had set up markets for a relief bounce. After seeing a bit of upside, some investors got antsy enough to want to jump back into equities. And when stocks ran up so sharply at midweek, some decided to take profits, as the saying goes, and get out.
In the end, bouncing around is just what markets do, isn’t it? That’s why I don’t blame sources when they decline to talk about intraday movements. I’ve encountered a handful of long-term portfolio managers who scoff at the very idea of reporting on daily market movements. The strategists who do talk do the best they can. Sometimes, if no macro explanation presents itself, they resort to talking about individual stocks or sectors.
100% correct.