• Biomet’s Earnings
    Posted by on September 20th, 2006 at 8:52 am

    Biomet (BMET) reported earnings of 42 cents a share this morning. That’s a penny below analysts’ consensus so the stock will probably be under pressure today. Sales were up just 5% to $508 million. The company said that sales at its trauma and spine unit (ick) were $12 million below management’s expectations. Over 330 jobs have been cut from that department. Biomet also said that its “comfortable” with second-quarter estimates of 44 cents to 46 cents a share, and sales of $519 million to $540 million.

  • Oil Plunges Below $62 A Barrel
    Posted by on September 19th, 2006 at 2:56 pm

    The fall in oil continues. In fact, it’s accelerating. Here’s a chart of October light sweet crude:
    October Oil.bmp
    From AP:

    “We’ll see sub-$2.25 a gallon retail (prices) by October,” said Tom Kloza, director of the Oil Price Information Service, adding that prices below $2 can already be found in Kansas, Missouri, South Carolina and other states.

    At one point, oil got down to $61.58 a barrel from $63.80 yesterday. Ticker Sense notes the correlation between the price of oil and President Bush’s approval numbers.

  • The Flat Yield Curve
    Posted by on September 19th, 2006 at 11:31 am

    Yield Curve 1.bmp
    Actually, the yield isn’t even flat anymore, it’s a bowl. The yield on the five-year note is lower than both the 90-day bill and the 10-year bond.
    The Federal Reserve came close to flattening out the yield curve earlier this year at about 4.5%. Then the long-end run away from the central bank. But over the summer, long-term yields started to head back down and they crossed the short-term yields on the way.
    I still wouldn’t mind seeing another 25 or 50 basis points from the Fed. I think we’ve forgotten how high inflation-adjusted short-term rates can go. I think the basic rule should be to keep interest rates about 3% above the core rate of inflation during an expansion. And during a recession, real rates should be close to zero as possible without going negative.

  • Our Remarkable Growth
    Posted by on September 19th, 2006 at 10:45 am

    BRIC.gif
    Investors these days hear a lot about “the rise of China” or the “rise of India.” In today’s Wall Street Journal, Michael Milken points out:

    China and India combined to produce nearly half the world’s economic output in 1820 compared to just 1.8% for the U.S. Our remarkable growth since 1820 has benefited from democratic institutions, a belief in capitalism, private property rights, an entrepreneurial culture, abundant resources, openness to foreign investment, the best universities, immigration and relatively transparent markets. (Hat tip: Prof. Mankiw).

    On a related note, Investor’s Business Daily comments on Sweden’s economy:

    And it’s wrong to praise Sweden’s current economic performance. Sweden ranks 14th worldwide in per capita income now, but in 1970 it ranked fourth. That’s a big drop.
    The average Swede earns $29,800 a year. Not bad, you say? That’s less than the average person in Mississippi. Some model.

  • FactSet Beat the Street
    Posted by on September 19th, 2006 at 9:55 am

    FactSet did it again! This company just keeps delivering the earnings.
    This morning, FactSet Research Systems (FDS) reported earnings of 46 cents a share for its fourth quarter (ending in August). Excluding charges for stock compensation, FDS earned 48 cents a share, six cents more than Street estimates.
    The shares are up 7% this morning to a new all-time high. Last year, the company made 37 cents a share for the fourth quarter. Sales were up 27% to $105 million.
    Not only does the company have strong growth, it has consistent growth. Here are the sales and EPS numbers for the past few years:
    Year………………….Sales (mil)…………..EPS
    1996…………………$44.35……………….$0.13
    1997…………………$58.36……………….$0.18
    1998…………………$78.91……………….$0.26
    1999…………………$103.83……………..$0.37
    2000…………………$134.18……………..$0.49
    2001…………………$167.56……………..$0.64
    2002…………………$198.29……………..$0.78
    2003…………………$222.30……………..$0.98
    2004…………………$251.91……………..$1.15
    2005…………………$312.64……………..$1.43
    2006…………………$387.35……………..$1.64
    FDS1.bmp

  • The Future for Facebook
    Posted by on September 18th, 2006 at 3:14 pm

    Last year, Facebook was worth $100 million. This year, it received a $1 billion buyout offer from Yahoo (YHOO). Well…that is until Yahoo’s stock got head-butted in the chest this summer.
    MarketWatch’s Bambi Francisco has more on the social networking site:

    Facebook CEO and founder Mark Zuckerberg told me last week that the decision is aligned with his long-held mission statement at Facebook. “We’re a company trying to help people understand their world,” he said, suggesting that the word “people” is broad, comprising more than just those who are in colleges, high school and at work (except for those under 13 years of age, for now).
    Such a decision to open up, however, may have unintended negative consequences, much like last week’s community uprising over a new service that cast personal information as essentially news bulletins.
    If Facebook eases this new service across its 9-million member society without a glitch, it will mark a right of passage into the big leagues, to some extent.
    You see, Facebook — though only two years old — is on the fast track to being perceived and valued as a grown up. As such, every major decision is a test of its will to fit into such mature billion-dollar shoes.

    Here’s an unintentionally funny interview Bambi did with the Zuckerberg, the company’s 22-year-old CEO. Let’s just say that he doesn’t lack in self-confidence. Also, he seems completely baffled by the presence of his own hands.

  • Northern Empire Soars on Buyout
    Posted by on September 18th, 2006 at 9:43 am

    Last November I wrote about stocks flying below Wall Street’s radar, meaning teeny micro-cap stocks that aren’t followed by any Wall Street analysts. Investors are often surprised to learn that some of the best publicly traded companies are completely ignored by Wall Street.
    In my original post, I mentioned three small banks. Today, the second one got bought out. Northern Empire Bancshares (NREB) is going to be acquired by Sterling Financial (STSA) for $335 million in cash and stock.

    Under the deal, approved by both companies’ boards, Sterling will pay 0.805 common shares and $2.71 in cash for each share of Northern Empire. Based on Sterling’s closing price of $33.04 on Friday, the offer values Northern Empire shares at $29.31 a piece, a 22 percent premium to its closing price of $23.98 the same day.

    Northern Empire is puny, just 150 employees, 11 branches and zero analysts covering it. But look at NREB’s earnings-per-share results for the last few years:
    1999 $0.55
    2000 $0.68
    2001 $0.77
    2002 $0.81
    2003 $0.97
    2004 $1.18
    2005 $1.51
    That stands up to any mega-cap bank. For the first half of 2006, NREB earned 82 cents share compared with 73 cents last year.
    The first bank that was bought out was a thrift, NewMil Bancorp (NMIL), in April. The only one left standing is also an S&L, Coastal Financial (CFCP).

  • Spreading Financial Literacy
    Posted by on September 18th, 2006 at 7:39 am

    HSAN_NASDAQ_photo_1.jpg
    Kudos to Russell Simmons. The hip-hop mogul is working to spread financial literacy through his non-profit Hip-Hop Summit Action Network.
    Far too many Americans are financially illiterate, especially young people. The subject simply isn’t taught in many schools. Thirty percent of black households are “unbanked.” That’s disgraceful, and it needs to change.
    Here’s video of Simmons ringing the opening bell on the Nasdaq.

  • Gas at $1.15 a Gallon?.
    Posted by on September 18th, 2006 at 7:09 am

    Philip Verleger says that oil could plunge to $15 a barrel, which would mean $1.15 gas at the pump.

    For most of the past two years, oil prices have risen because the world’s oil producers have struggled to keep pace with growing demand, particularly from China and India. Spare oil-production capacity grew so tight that market players feared that any disruption to oil production could create shortages.
    Fear of disruption focused on fighting in Nigeria, escalating tensions over Iran’s nuclear program, violence between Israel and Lebanon that might spread to oil-producing neighbors, and the prospect that hurricanes might topple oil facilities in the Gulf of Mexico.
    Oil traders bet that such worrisome developments would drive up the future price of oil. Oil is traded in contracts for future delivery, and companies that take physical delivery of oil are just a small part of total trading. Large pension and commodities funds are the big traders and they’re seeking profits. They’ve sunk $105 billion or more into oil futures in recent years, according to Verleger. Their bets that oil prices would rise in the future bid up the price of oil.
    That, in turn, led users of oil to create stockpiles as cushions against supply disruptions and even higher future prices. Now inventories of oil are approaching 1990 levels.

    Why should we listen to Verleger? Well, he was one of the few people who saw an oil price spike coming.

  • BW: All Net New Jobs Since ’01 Are in Health Care
    Posted by on September 18th, 2006 at 6:19 am

    According to the latest Business Week, the health-care industry has added 1.7 million jobs since 2001. The rest of the private sector, none.

    For years, everyone from politicians on both sides of the aisle to corporate execs to your Aunt Tilly have justifiably bemoaned American health care — the out-of-control costs, the vast inefficiencies, the lack of access, and the often inexplicable blunders.
    But the very real problems with the health-care system mask a simple fact: Without it the nation’s labor market would be in a deep coma. Since 2001, 1.7 million new jobs have been added in the health-care sector, which includes related industries such as pharmaceuticals and health insurance. Meanwhile, the number of private-sector jobs outside of health care is no higher than it was five years ago.

    This is a good example of an accurate but misleading statistic. Always be wary of the numbers that talk about “all of the increase” coming from this or that. For example, since the beginning of 1999, the entire gain of the S&P 500 has come on just two days. That’s true, but it’s not the whole story.
    You can select crucial dates, then discount certain factors and presto, you’ve got a scary headline. The key to remember is that this stat talks about net new jobs. Sure, lots of folks were hired as Web developers and laid off six months later. I think I knew most of them. If you want to be even scarier, the U.S. economy destroys millions of jobs every year. But it usually creates even more.
    The interesting thing isn’t the sluggish job growth, but the fact that corporate profits have climbed so much despite the sluggish job growth. That’s productivity. The average worker is doing far more than he or she was five years ago.