• Hormel Foods Beats and Raises
    Posted by on August 19th, 2015 at 7:52 am

    Hormel Foods (HRL) reported fiscal third earnings of 56 cents per share. That was one penny better than expectations. The company also raised their full-year guidance to $2.57 to $2.63 per share. The previous range was $2.50 to $2.60 per share. The new guidance represents earnings growth of 15% to 18% over last year.

    “Our balanced business model prevailed once again this quarter, as we were able to overcome the significant challenge of avian influenza in our Jennie-O Turkey Store segment to deliver record earnings and volume sales,” said Jeffrey M. Ettinger, chairman of the board, president and chief executive officer. “Grocery Products drove earnings growth with favorable input costs and increased sales of HORMEL® chili and SKIPPY® peanut butter. Specialty Foods also delivered excellent results, as the team continues to increase sales of MUSCLE MILK® protein nutrition products, and improve the cost structure and synergies between our CytoSport and Century Foods businesses. Revenues were down for the quarter, impacted by lower pricing due to declining pork markets affecting our Refrigerated Foods and International segments, and the loss of sales related to avian influenza in the Jennie-O Turkey Store segment.

  • Long-Term Chart of Hormel Foods
    Posted by on August 18th, 2015 at 3:09 pm

    Dull is good. Look at the Hormel Foods (HRL) log chart since 1990.

    sc08182015b

    In 2008, the stock fell 42%, but it looks like a minor setback in this chart.

  • The Volition Bias
    Posted by on August 18th, 2015 at 1:50 pm

    Please indulge me for a bit while I offer a somewhat rambling post. Barry Ritholtz often writes about cognitive biases and how they affect our investment decisions. This is especially important in financial matters. There are plenty of otherwise rational people who think a coin that’s gone heads the last four times has a high chance of going tails because, well, tails is due. What’s especially interesting is how these biases seep into our thinking without our realizing it.

    I’d like to offer another bias to the literature: seeing the world of finance as being unduly under the control of people or institutions. Let’s call it the “Volition Bias.” I see this every day. All sorts of commentators talk about the role of the Federal Reserve or Goldman Sachs or high-frequency traders.

    The disquieting reality is that no one’s in charge. The market just is. It’s not easy to grasp this point, but it’s true. The market is controlled by the market. Obviously, some groups are certainly influential, but what’s lost sight of is that they’re merely players in the game just like everyone else. Too much market commentary is simply cynicism masquerading as wisdom.

    This extends to the role of finance itself, and I say this as a finance person. Think of the economy as having two parts. One part is where people make stuff. The other is where people in suits trade colored pieces of paper. That’s the finance side. While finance is critical, it’s always subservient to the real economy. Finance helps push the economy along. The bias I often see is people mistaking the financial economy for the real economy.

    Let me give you an example. (As usual, these are generalities, but broad enough to be important.) When a company runs into financial trouble, it’s usually the result of operational troubles. The financial troubles are merely a manifestation of their operational issues. They’re not bad because they’re in too much debt. They’re in too much debt because they’re bad. It’s certainly possible for a healthy company to be done in by financial mismanagement, but that takes some effort.

    Put it this way. If there’s news of a group of people meeting in a room, it’s probably not that important to you as an investor. Is an OPEC meeting important? Of course. In the short term. But they’re merely reacting to the same variables we all see. A Fed meeting is also important. But the Fed isn’t, despite what you may have heard, making the weaker argument the stronger. They’re only trying to manage monetary policy. (I didn’t say they were good at it.)

    I’m sure there are cases of price manipulation that we never know about. But that can only last for so long. In the end, the market is controlled by the market. The truly important events for investors are the decisions made by a large group of consumers. People want the best product or service at the best price. Find that, and all the financial issues will follow.

  • Morning News: August 18, 2015
    Posted by on August 18th, 2015 at 7:12 am

    Emerging Stocks Decline as Thai Bomb Adds to China, Fed Concerns

    German Lawmakers Debate Greek Bailout, Merkel Faces Rebellion

    Putin Revives Soviet Deal of Pretend-Work-and-Pay to Hide Crisis

    China Turned to Risky Devaluation as Export Machine Stalled

    Sterling Rallies After UK Inflation Beats Expectations

    World’s Biggest Currency Trade Is Stuck in a Fed-Induced Rut

    Methane Leaks in Natural-Gas Supply Chain Far Exceed Estimates, Study Says

    Jeff Bezos and Amazon Employees Join Debate Over Its Culture

    Wal-Mart Cuts Outlook on Investments in Wages, E-Commerce

    Recovery in U.S. Housing Market Drives Home Depot Sales Beat

    Zulily Is Lost Up The Amazon With Latest Deal

    Illumina, Warburg Pincus Form Consumer-Genomics Startup Helix

    Fish Farming Becomes Bigger Business Than the Open Sea

    Jeff Carter: The Millennials Are Coming, The Millennials Are Coming

    Joshua Brown: Five Things I Learned from Carol Loomis Today

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • New High Today for the Buy List
    Posted by on August 17th, 2015 at 4:11 pm

    We had a few new highs today for our Buy List. Fiserv (FISV), Hormel Foods (HRL), Snap-on (SNA) and Stryker (SYK) all touched new 52-week highs today. Also, the Buy List closed a new high for the year with a 7.89% YTD gain.

  • What’s Up with Emerson Electric?
    Posted by on August 17th, 2015 at 11:27 am

    I caution investors to try to avoid buying a stock with a P/E Ratio of 10 and hoping it doubles to 20. A better strategy is to look for a stock where the E — the earnings — can triple in a decade.

    I think value investors too often overemphasize the value portion of the equation at the expense of growth. The value side can really be summed as “don’t do anything crazy.” Outside that, I don’t worry too much about value. And I never try to short based on value.

    Lately, I’ve been looking at the stock of Emerson Electric (EMR). Emerson has long been one of those stalwart blue chip stocks. They’ve raised their dividend every year since the Eisenhower administration.

    big08172015

    But the shares have come under hard times recently. EMR dropped from a high of $62.75 in May to a low of $47.83 last week. It’s currently just below $50 per share. As a domestic manufacturer, the strong dollar has hit Emerson hard. The last earnings report was a complete dud:

    Given that little change is expected in market conditions for the remainder of the year, Emerson again slashed guidance. The company now projects $3.97 to $4.07 in per-share earnings for the business year ending in September, down from its last estimate of $4.17 to $4.32 a share. That range includes a gain of 77 cents a share stemming from its power-transmissions divestiture.

    The company, which had said it would accelerate restructuring plans, said full-year restructuring is now expected to be between $160 million and $180 million.

    In all for the June quarter, Emerson earned $564 million, or 84 cents a share, down from $728 million, or $1.03 a share, a year earlier.

    Revenue slid 13% to $5.5 billion. Stripping out currency effects and the impacts of divestitures, sales fell 5%, the company said.

    Ouch!

    But there’s an upside (you were probably wondering). Emerson is planning some big changes. In June, they said they’ll spinoff their network-power business. The company’s previous strategy was to go into network power in a big way. To put it lightly, that was a flop. Fortunately, the company is trying to undo the problem. Emerson is also considering selling off part of their industrial-automation group.

    I like these moves, and I’m impressed when a good company recognizes the bad moves they’ve made. The slimmed-down Emerson could be a very good buy. It’s too early to say just yet, but EMR is a stock to watch.

  • Morning News: August 17, 2015
    Posted by on August 17th, 2015 at 6:37 am

    European Stocks Bounce Back From Worst Week in Six

    Tsipras Likely to Call Confidence Vote After Party Revolt

    Merkel Says She’s Confident IMF Will Join Greek Bailout

    Japan Says Its Economy Contracted in Second Quarter

    Crude Oil Futures Down on Weak Asian Cues

    U.S. Industrial Production Ratchets Up in July

    Morgan Stanley’s Fragile Five Swells to Troubled 10 in Selloff

    IndiGo Finalizes $26.5 Billion Purchase of 250 New Airbus Jets

    LG Display to Focus Investment on OLED in Next-Generation Push

    Cargill Buys Norwegian Fish-Feed Producer EWOS for $1.5 billion

    Samsung Slumps to 10-Month Low on Disappointment With Phones

    Disney Bulks Up Theme Parks as Universal Gains Ground

    Jeff Bezos Says He Doesn’t Recognise ‘Soulless and Dystopian’ Portrayal of Amazon

    Roger Nusbaum: Rent or Buy?

    Howard Lindzon: EVERYONE Should Angel Invest….and Robinhood Launches Android App

    Be sure to follow me on Twitter.

  • 10-Year TIPs Yield and Stock Returns
    Posted by on August 14th, 2015 at 12:52 pm

    I’ve been crunching the numbers on stock returns and the 10-year TIPs yield.

    Intuitively, this relationship makes sense. TIPs are a decent measure of expected bond values, so the lower their yields, the better the return ought to be for stocks.

    One problem is that there’s not a lot of data. I went to FRED and took all 10-year TIPs data, which only goes back to 2003. I then compared it with the Wilshire 5,000 Total Return Index. I wish we had more data. In time, that will come.

    I compared the TIPs yield on one day and with the equity return the following day. I divided the TIPs into eight different buckets. Here’s what I got, listed by ascending TIP yield.

    TIPs Yield Days Annualized Return
    < -0.5 217 26.36%
    -0.5 to 0 172 25.21%
    0 to 0.5 448 10.38%
    0.5 to 1.0 347 15.47%
    1.0 to 1.5 379 11.88%
    1.5 to 2.0 807 7.20%
    2.0 to 2.5 676 11.09%
    Over 2.5 105 -43.93%

    So when TIPs pay nothing, or less than nothing, people turn to stocks. When TIPs start offering a real alternative, stocks are abandoned. The TIPs tipping point seems to be at 2.43%. Above that, stocks turn negative.

    These numbers are pretty impressive. As I said before, I’d like to see a lot more data but we just don’t have it yet. I’m also concerned that the disruptions caused by the financial crisis mucked up some the relationship. Still, over the long term, this should hold up. As always, the data will say.

    When the 10-year TIPs is 1.63% or higher, the stock market is basically flat (about 0.57% per year, which is less than TIPs could have gotten you).

  • Industrial Production Rebounds
    Posted by on August 14th, 2015 at 11:21 am

    After falling for five months in a row, industrial production has rebounded for two months in a row. IP rose by a healthy 0.6% in July.

    Economists surveyed by The Wall Street Journal had expected a 0.4% increase in industrial production last month and capacity utilization of 78.0%.

    Manufacturing output, which accounts for almost three-quarters of overall industrial production, rose 0.8% in July. The improvement was nearly entirely due to better automotive production. Auto and auto parts manufacturing increased 10.6%. Production elsewhere in manufacturing edged up just 0.1%.

  • CWS Market Review – August 14, 2015
    Posted by on August 14th, 2015 at 7:08 am

    “Forecasts may tell you a great deal about the forecaster; they tell you nothing about the future.” – Warren Buffett

    In the past few weeks, several concerns of investors have been resolved. The mess in Greece didn’t become a larger problem. The selloff in China hasn’t metastasized. At least, not yet. Second-quarter earnings were pretty good. The strong dollar did some damage but not as much as was feared.

    Even worries about the Federal Reserve are beginning to subside. The Wall Street Journal surveyed several economists and found that 82% of them expect the Fed to raise rates next month. Only 13% expect the Fed to wait until December. It’s finally going to happen, and is the bond market scared? Not at all. Long-term rates have been falling.

    Given the resolution of these previously uncertain issues, that leaves us with a fairly dull market. Fine by me! I like dull markets. In this issue, I’ll go into a little more detail on the market’s recent behavior and why higher rates are nothing to fear. I’ll also preview two Buy List earnings reports for next week. Later on, I’ll update you on two Buy List stocks that just announced big new share buybacks. But first, let’s look at the July jobs report.

    Don’t Let Higher Rates Scare You out of Stocks

    Last Friday, the government reported that the U.S. economy created 215,000 net new jobs in July. That was basically in line with what economists had been expecting. The unemployment rate stayed at 5.3%.

    For me, the bigger news isn’t so much the jobs news as that it almost certainly confirms that the Fed is due to raise rates next month. Earlier, I cited the WSJ’s poll of economists. One caveat is that the September meeting will be followed by a press conference from Fed Chairwoman Janet Yellen. No press conference is scheduled for the October meeting. The assumption is that Yellen wants to raise rates in conjunction with a press conference. That makes sense, and it’s why only 3% of economists think the Fed will make a move in October.

    This would be the first time in nine years that the Fed would raise rates. To borrow a phrase from the Harding administration, a rate increase will be an important step in our “return to normalcy.” Zero-percent rates and all the bond buying were emergency measures. That time has passed.

    But I want to remind investors that a rate hike is by no means awful news for stocks. Let’s remember that short-term rates will still be quite low. In fact, they’ll still be below inflation, and they will most likely remain that way for quite some time.

    From 2004 to 2006, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 0.25% at 17 consecutive meetings. Yet the stock market kept on rallying. Stocks rallied through higher rates in 1988-89, and again in 1999-2000. In the latter example, the market survived the first four 0.25% rate hikes. The fifth, however, was too much to bear; and for good measure, the Fed added a sixth increase, which was 0.5%. The market soon nosedived.

    My point is that the beginning of a rate-hike cycle is nothing to fear. Investors should understand that this will alter some fundamentals of business. For example, yield spreads will narrow. What we need to be concerned with is the possible excesses of a tightening cycle. When that happens, short-term rates run 3% or 4% more than inflation. We’re a long way off from that happening.

    sc08142015

    If anything, the commodity markets are working to hold down inflation. July was a terrible month for commodities. The CRB Index (see above) is toying with a 40-year low. Sugar, for example, is at a multi-year low. Oil prices are now at a six-year low. Yesterday, light sweet crude fell to $42.23 per barrel. That’s the lowest price since March 2009 when the bull market began. The rout may not be over. OPEC countries are continuing to pump out oil at a very rapid clip. The old cartel might be finished. Now let’s look at some earnings reports coming out next week.

    Earnings Next Week from Hormel Foods and Ross Stores

    We have two Buy List stocks that ended their quarters in July, Hormel Foods and Ross Stores. Both stocks are due to report earnings next week.

    Hormel Foods (HRL) will report its fiscal third-quarter earnings before the opening bell on Wednesday, August 19. Hormel is shaping up to be one of our better stocks this year. Through Thursday, the shares are up 16.1% YTD. I always enjoy watching these humdrum stocks thrive.

    There had been concerns that avian flu would ding Hormel’s earnings. The company conceded that it was a problem, but the damage was limited. I like hearing companies give us bad news straight. For fiscal Q2, Hormel made 67 cents per share which was four cents better than estimates. For now, the company is sticking by its full-year EPS forecast of $2.50 to $2.60 per share. I think they can hit it.

    Wall Street expects fiscal Q3 earnings of 55 cents per share. My numbers say that’s about right. Don’t expect a big earnings beat here. Last week, the shares touched a new 52-week high of $61.32. This is a solid, long-term investment.

    In the last year, Ross Stores (ROST) has been a huge winner for us. From July 16, 2014 to Thursday’s close, the deep discounter’s stock is up more than 70%.

    I was a little concerned about Ross’s latest guidance. The company said it expects earnings to range between $1.19 and $1.24 per share. Frankly, I think they’re low-balling us. I know Ross likes to do that, and naturally, we know how this game is played.

    big08142015

    Perhaps as much as earnings, I want to see same-store sales. This is huge for all retailers. In their last report, Ross had same-store sales growth of 5%. But they told us to expect 2% to 3% growth for this coming report. Incidentally, the Commerce Department released a good retail-sales report this week. For July, retail sales rose by 0.6%. The report for June was revised higher from a 0.3% drop to flat. This may bode well for Ross’s earnings.

    Shares of Ross split 2-for-1 in June, and the stock has continued to climb higher. Last Thursday, Ross broke $55 per share for the first time. For now, I’m going to keep our Buy Below at $52 per share. I’ll also certainly raise it next week, but I want to see their numbers first.

    Buy List Bargains and Additional Updates

    Periodically, I like to highlight some of our Buy List stocks that look especially attractive at the moment. Bear in mind that I consider any Buy List stock that’s below its Buy Below price to be a buy.

    Last month, I mentioned that Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY) is cheap below $65 per share. But that’s a more speculative buy. The shares have performed terribly since April. I think the selling is overdone.

    Microsoft (MSFT) continues to be a good buy here. I thought the last earnings report was quite good, but the stock hasn’t done much. My Buy Below is at $49, but if it you can get it below $46, you got a good deal. The current yield is 2.65%.

    I also like Signature Bank (SBNY) below $142. The bank had another solid earnings report, but the shares dropped nearly 12% from the July high to the August low. Take advantage of any pullback.

    By the way, the only three stocks that have been Buy List members all ten years are AFLAC, Bed Bath & Beyond and Fiserv (FISV). Since the Buy List started in 2006, Fiserv has gained 312% for us. On Thursday, it made another new high.

    I also wanted to pass along a few updates to some other Buy List stocks.

    This week, Moog (MOG-A) announced that it’s expanding its share-buyback program by four million shares. Their original program authorized them to repurchase nine million shares of their stock. They had already plowed through 8.3 million. The total is now being expanded to 4.7 million.

    “Our cash flow has been strong over the last few years,” said John Scannell, Chairman and CEO. “This has afforded us the opportunity to return nearly $600 million of value to our shareholders in the form of a share-repurchase program that we initiated in early 2014. We are pleased to have the flexibility to continue this program.”

    Moog had a good earnings report recently. They earned $1.05 per share for their fiscal third quarter, 11 cents better than estimates. Unfortunately, the company lowered its full-year forecast for the third time. Moog now expects full-year earnings of $3.50 per share.

    The good news is that Moog said it expects to make $4 per share next fiscal year (ending September 2015). That’s impressive, and I didn’t see it coming. It’s no secret that I haven’t been impressed with Moog this year, but the new guidance and expanded share buyback are positive signs. I’m keeping my Buy Below on Moog at $72 per share.

    AFLAC (AFL) also announced a big share buyback. Let me add that one of my criticisms of share buybacks is that it too easily lets companies put out feel-good press releases. But when high-quality companies like Moog or AFLAC do it, I don’t feel quite so manipulated. These companies have the cash flow to back it up.

    AFLAC said it´s adding 40 million shares to its current program, which is down to a puny 16 million. This means the company plans to buy back 56 million shares, which is about 13% of the outstanding stock. That’s a nice chunk of change.

    Commenting on the news, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Daniel P. Amos stated: “I am very pleased with this action by our board of directors. Whether we’re talking about our operations in Japan or the U.S., as an insurance company, our primary mission is to fulfill our obligations to our policyholders. At the same time, we are listening to our shareholders and understand the importance of capital deployment. In our second quarter of 2015 earnings release, we reinforced our plan to repurchase $1.3 billion of our common stock in 2015 and believe that over the next few years, we’ll be able to increase the capital available for deployment.”

    AFLAC had a good earnings report for Q2, plus they raised guidance. The stock has finally woken up from its long slumber. On Monday, AFL closed at $64.92 per share which is its highest close in 17 months.

    Speaking of all these buybacks, on Wednesday, the S&P 500 had its biggest intra-day turnaround in three years. What caused all the buying? Apparently, companies were in on it. Goldman Sachs said that they had their busiest day since 2011 buying back shares for their corporate clients. Since the bull market began, companies have bought back more than $2 trillion worth of stock.

    When PayPal (PYPL) split off from eBay, I set our initial Buy Below at $42 per share. I wanted to give the Buy Below a little “air,” just in case the shares popped after the spin-off, and that’s pretty much what happened on the first day. Now that a little time has passed, I want to lower our Buy Below on PayPal to $40 per share. Don’t misunderstand me—I like PYPL a lot. I’m just reeling in our Buy Below.

    That’s all for now. Next week, the Fed will release the minutes of their most recent meeting. I think the evidence is clear that a rate hike is on its way. On Wednesday, the July CPI report comes out. There have been some signs that core inflation has crept higher this year. I’m curious to see if this trend is still in play. We also have two Buy List stocks due to report earnings. Be sure to keep checking the blog for daily updates. I’ll have more market analysis for you in the next issue of CWS Market Review!

    – Eddy